In this episode, we discuss the importance of consensus in science, both as means of establishing true knowledge and for determining which research questions might be worth pursuing. We also discuss barriers to reaching consensus and the different frameworks that are currently employed for trying to reach consensus among important stakeholders.

Shownotes

The Popper quote is from: Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge.

The Polanyi quote is from: Polanyi, M. (1950). Freedom in Science. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 6(7), 195–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.1950.11461263

Planck's Principle: A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.

The Many Smiles collaboration: Coles, N. A., et al., (2020). The Many Smiles collaboration: A multi-Lab foundational test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/cvpuw

Paul Meehl's 50 year rule: Meehl, P. E. (1992). Cliometric metatheory: The actuarial approach to empirical, history-based philosophy of science. Psychological Reports, 71, 339–339.

Mulkay, M. (1978). Consensus in science. Social Science Information, 17(1), 107-122.

Deliberative Polling

Laudan, L. (1986). Science and values: The aims of science and their role in scientific debate. Univ of California Press.

PRIVACY TOOLS: GHOSTPADS, GHOSTPHONES, & MORE [VIDEO][LIBERTY UNDER ATTACK PUBLICATIONS]