Prince Harry's recent phone hacking victory against Mirror Group Newspapers is analyzed, discussing the implications for the Royal Family and the press in the UK. The chapter also explores the emergence of phone hacking lawsuits and settlements as a lucrative industry for lawyers, along with ongoing investigations and civil cases involving Prince Harry. His mission to reform tabloids and ongoing clashes with the media are also discussed. The chapter concludes with a mention of a television series covering events of the 1950s and 1960s and a call to action for listeners to engage with the podcast.
The landmark ruling against Mirror Group Newspapers sets a precedent for Prince Harry's ongoing legal actions against other newspaper groups, revealing the extent of phone hacking and implicating multiple organizations.
Prince Harry's pursuit of legal actions against media organizations challenges the traditional approach of the royal family and aims to deliver a free and honest press, potentially leaving the royal family on the wrong side of public opinion.
Deep dives
Prince Harry wins phone hacking legal battle against Mirror Group Newspapers
Prince Harry has been successful in a legal action against the owners of the Mirror newspaper, Mirror Group Newspapers, regarding phone hacking. The High Court in London ruled that Prince Harry was the victim of phone hacking between 2003 and 2009 and was awarded £140,600 in damages. The ruling also revealed extensive phone hacking by Mirror Group Newspapers from 2006 to 2011. This landmark decision sets a precedent as it is the first major trial where evidence has been heard in court and a judge has ruled on that evidence.
Prince Harry's individual claims and victory
Prince Harry claimed for 33 articles in this trial and the judge found in his favor for 15 of them. The articles mostly focused on his relationship with Chelsea Davies. While the judge described the phone hacking of Prince Harry's phone as quite modest in terms of frequency, it was found that many of his associates, including Chelsea Davies, had their phones hacked more frequently. This victory sets a significant precedent for Prince Harry's ongoing legal actions against other newspaper groups, including the owners of the mail and the news of the world.
Implications for the newspaper industry and media practices
The ruling signifies a seismic shift in the phone hacking story, moving beyond just the News of the World and now implicating other newspaper groups, such as the Mirror Group Newspapers. The judgment also points to the transformation and decline of the newspaper industry over the past two decades and highlights the extent to which newspapers would go to obtain exclusives, driven by the sales generated by stories about the royal family. As the industry faces financial challenges and job cuts, the ongoing legal cases and potential damages awards pose further costs and uncertainties for newspaper publishers.
The ramifications for the royal family and Prince Harry's mission
Prince Harry's determination to seek justice through legal actions against media organizations places him at odds with the traditional approach of the royal family, which tends to avoid court battles. His crusade against alleged illegality in the media aims to deliver a free and honest press that is properly accountable. The success of his phone hacking case against the Mirror Group Newspapers and his pursuit of further legal actions against news group newspapers and associated newspapers indicates a considerable personal cost to Prince Harry, but if successful, it could leave the royal family on the wrong side of public opinion, challenging the traditional gatekeeper role of media organizations on royal coverage.
Newscast brings you daily analysis of the latest news stories from the BBC. Today, we look at the High Court ruling that Prince Harry was the victim of phone hacking by Mirror Group Newspapers. MGN issue a statement saying the group “apologises unreservedly”. What does this mean for the future of the Royal Family, and for the press in this country?
Adam is joined by media editor Katie Razzall, home affairs correspondent Tom Symonds, and royal commentator Peter Hunt.
You can join our Newscast online community here: https://tinyurl.com/n#ewscastcommunityhere
Today's Newscast was presented by Adam Fleming. It was made by Jack Maclaren with Cordelia Hemming and Sam McLaren. The technical producer was Jack Graysmark. The senior news editors are Jonathan Aspinwall and Sam Bonham.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode