Trump's Terms What the downward revision in jobs numbers indicates about the U.S. economy
Sep 10, 2025
A surprising downward revision in U.S. job numbers raises questions about the economy's health. Experts discuss how this revision reveals a significant overestimation of job growth and its political ramifications. The conversation also touches on the largest adjustments in job statistics since 2000, exploring inaccuracies in reporting and their impact on the labor market. It's an insightful look at how data shapes both policy and public perception.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Why The Jobs Numbers Were Revised
- The BLS's annual benchmark compares its monthly survey to near-universal unemployment insurance records and produced a large downward revision of 911,000 jobs.
- Revisions reflect updated data and sampling problems like unrepresentative responses, undocumented worker measurement, and tracking new or closed businesses.
Analyst Background Shapes Interpretation
- David Wessel's background includes editing at The Wall Street Journal and work as a senior fellow at Brookings, framing his analysis.
- His Brookings role and prior journalism inform his interpretation of the BLS revisions and policy implications.
Downward Revisions May Signal Weakening
- Large downward revisions can be a warning sign that the economy is weakening and may foreshadow a recession.
- The revision itself is historical, but recent monthly reports also showed a hiring slowdown that could raise unemployment if it continues.