Three Decades of Bad Foreign Policy (Robert Wright & Scott Horton)
Dec 17, 2024
auto_awesome
Scott Horton, an anti-war libertarian and author of "Provoked," discusses his critical views on U.S. foreign policy, particularly regarding Russia and Ukraine. He delves into America's role in escalating the Russia-Ukraine conflict and questions whether the Maidan Revolution was a U.S.-backed coup. Horton examines the historical promises made about NATO expansion and how they shaped current tensions. He also highlights the complex interplay of billionaires' influence in global politics and the moral implications of foreign interventions.
The anti-war movement, influenced by libertarian ideologies, has historically countered neoconservative interventionism in American foreign policy.
Debates surrounding the U.S. responsibility in provoking Russia's aggression in Ukraine highlight the complex implications of NATO's expansion.
The characterization of the Maidan Revolution as a U.S.-backed coup illustrates the consequences of foreign intervention in sovereign nations.
Deep dives
The Roots of Anti-War Ideology
Anti-war sentiment has a historical foundation dating back to its inception in the mid-1990s through the efforts of figures like Eric Garris and Justin Raimondo, who shaped its ideological lineage. The influence of libertarianism emerged prominently, driven by thinkers like Murray Rothbard, who argued against U.S. military intervention and emphasized individual liberties and non-interventionist principles. This ideological framework positioned the anti-war movement as a counter to neoconservative agendas, particularly during major conflicts like the Iraq War, where the neoconservative mindset was criticized for its interventionist approach and disregard for the consequences of such actions. This context highlights the anti-war movement's role as a significant counter-narrative within the wider discourse on American foreign policy.
The Provocation of Russia
The idea that U.S. actions led to the provocation of Russia's military aggression in Ukraine is a central argument made, suggesting that Washington's foreign policy has escalated tensions. This narrative frames the U.S. as placing pressure on Russia through NATO's eastward expansion and fostering a pro-Western stance in Ukraine, ultimately leaving Russia feeling cornered. It is argued that rather than acting purely in self-defense, Russia's decision to invade Ukraine was prompted by decades of U.S. foreign policy maneuvers, which stirred fears of encroachment on Russian interests. This perspective calls into question the moral responsibility associated with military action, emphasizing the importance of understanding the broader geopolitical implications of U.S. decisions.
The Maidan Revolution: A Controversial Shift
The Maidan Revolution of 2014, which resulted in the ousting of Ukraine's pro-Russian president, is often characterized as a pivotal moment influenced by Western intervention. Critics argue that U.S. involvement, including financial support and the encouragement of protest movements, effectively orchestrated a coup that altered Ukraine's political landscape. This situation is further complicated by accusations that the West endorsed nationalist elements, some of which include far-right factions, during this tumultuous period, thus shaping the future of Ukrainian politics. The analysis of this revolution reflects broader discussions about the ethics and consequences of interventionist policies in sovereign nations.
NATO Expansion and Its Ramifications
The expansion of NATO after the Cold War has been a contested issue, often cited as a key factor leading to rising tensions between the West and Russia. Many argue that promises made to the Soviet Union during the dissolution of its influence were broken, as NATO gradually incorporated Eastern European countries, thus bringing military forces closer to Russia's borders. This contentious relationship highlights a significant miscalculation on the part of U.S. policymakers, who dismissed Russian concerns about national security as they pursued an expansionist agenda. The ongoing debate surrounding NATO's expansion illuminates the complexity of international relations and the potential fallout from perceived threats to a nation's sovereignty.
Understanding Historical Context and Miscommunication
The historical context of U.S.-Russia relations demonstrates a persistent narrative of misunderstanding and miscommunication that fuels current geopolitical conflict. Figures like George Kennan warned against NATO expansion, predicting that it would lead to resentment from Russia and contribute to future instability. The decision to expand NATO was partly influenced by domestic political considerations, often prioritizing short-term gains over long-term stability and diplomatic relations. This ongoing theme of failing to accurately gauge the perspectives of other nations serves as a cautionary tale for future foreign policy decisions, emphasizing the importance of empathy and foresight in international diplomacy.
Scott’s anti-war libertarianism and his new book, Provoked: How Washington Started the New Cold War with Russia and the Catastrophe in Ukraine ... How the US made the Russia-Ukraine war more likely ... Was Ukraine’s Maidan Revolution a US-backed coup? ... America’s promise to the Soviet Union not to expand NATO ... Do US officials misunderstand Russia’s perspective? ... Heading to Overtime ...
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode