The podcast dives into the legal showdown between the Associated Press and the Trump administration over press access. It explores Ed Martin’s politically charged letters targeting Democrats and the implications for due process. Discussions also touch on Sam Bankman-Fried’s self-victimization strategies from prison and the complexities of pardon applications linked to January 6th. Additionally, the episode scrutinizes a controversial Iowa poll and the ensuing lawsuit by Donald Trump, highlighting the intersection of polling accuracy and First Amendment rights.
The Associated Press has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration over First Amendment violations regarding press access restrictions.
Ed Martin's politically charged actions as acting U.S. attorney raise concerns about the weaponization of legal frameworks against political dissenters.
Deep dives
AP's Legal Battle with the White House
The Associated Press (AP) has initiated a legal case against the White House, asserting First Amendment violations and due process concerns after being excluded from key press events. The White House's rationale for exclusion was deemed arbitrary, challenging the administration's discretion in selecting media personnel for access. Judge Trevor McFadden acknowledged the lack of immediate harm to justify a temporary restraining order but indicated that the law tends to favor the AP's position. The outcome may hinge on whether the White House has ceded authority to the White House Correspondents Association, which could limit the administration's ability to exclude outlets like the AP.
Ed Martin's Controversial Involvement
Ed Martin, the acting U.S. attorney for D.C., has complicatingly inserted himself into the AP's litigation, issuing statements perceived as politically charged. His actions include sending letters to lawmakers allegedly overstepping appropriate investigative protocols, which have drawn criticism for appearing to threaten and intimidate political dissenters. Critics view these actions as examples of performative politics rather than serious legal investigation, noting there's no direct evidence that Martin's inquiries are rooted in valid threats. This involvement raises concerns over the weaponization of legal frameworks against political adversaries.
Retaliatory Actions Against Legal Firms
The Trump administration has reportedly retaliated against Covington and Burling for providing pro bono assistance to Jack Smith amid investigations into Trump. The administration has contemplated revoking security clearances for attorneys associated with firms that legally represent opposing perspectives, raising alarms about the impact on defense attorneys’ abilities to represent clients in cases involving national security. Legal experts view this as a severe breach of ethical norms that could stifle fair representation and expose defendants to significant disadvantages. Potential judicial remedies could involve preventing the administration from using classified evidence if they continue down this retaliatory path.
Missed Poll Predictions and Legal Ramifications
Ann Selzer, a respected Iowa pollster, faced backlash from Donald Trump for a poll that incorrectly positioned Kamala Harris as the frontrunner, leading to a lawsuit. The allegations cite consumer protection violations, claiming the poll was fraudulent, though these claims lack robust legal backing according to the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression. Their motion to dismiss highlights the absence of legal precedent supporting a 'fake news’ exception in political speech, ultimately bolstering Selzer's defense. This case underscores the tension between political expression and accountability in polling, raising questions about the extent of legal repercussions for perceived inaccuracies in political forecasts.
The Trump administration continues to ice out the Associated Press, and now the AP is suing. We discuss how the administration changed its argument (not great, from a policy perspective, but it may actually put the White House on stronger legal ground). Ed Martin — the conservative activist serving as acting US Attorney for the District of Columbia, whom Trump has named to be the permanent US Attorney for that district — continues to send out weird, threatening letters about non-criminal behavior by Democrats. Ken has instructions about what you should do if you get such a letter.
Sign up for our newsletter and find a transcript of this episode at serioustrouble.show.
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.serioustrouble.show/subscribe
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode