Deadline: White House “The testimony of Jack Smith”
Jan 22, 2026
Dan Goldman, a former prosecutor and Democratic congressman, joins voting rights attorney Mark Elias and political analyst Alex Wagner to dissect Jack Smith's significant testimony about Donald Trump's actions during the 2020 election. They discuss Smith's confidence in his case, the intimidation tactics used by Trump, and the potential implications for democracy and accountability. The panel emphasizes the importance of legal transparency and the dangers of disinformation, all while advocating for a collective commitment to uphold the rule of law.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
A Prosecutor's Unwavering Credibility
- Jack Smith presented himself as a calm, apolitical career prosecutor with confidence in his cases.
- He said he had proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Donald Trump committed serious crimes.
Prevention Over Waiting For Harm
- Courts found Trump's statements deterred witnesses and threatened proceedings even without a single named victim.
- Smith argued prosecutors need not wait for extreme harm before seeking protective orders.
Threats Won't Change The Record
- Jack Smith said Trump’s attacks aimed to intimidate him and others but would not deter his work.
- He emphasized following department policy and the law despite threats.