Legal AF by MeidasTouch Judge LOOSE Cannon SCREWS UP 40 Years of Precedent in AN INSTANT
7 snips
Jun 25, 2024 A judge challenges decades of legal precedent regarding special counsels, creating a stir in the courtroom. The discussion dives into the significance of U.S. v. Nixon and the legitimacy of special prosecutor appointments. Attention shifts to Judge Aileen Cannon's unusual courtroom choices and the implications of her decisions on the Mar-a-Lago case. The episode unpacks historical perspectives and the evolution of special counsel regulations while hinting at the motives behind Cannon's rulings, including her connections to the Federalist Society.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Special Prosecutor Validated By U.S. v. Nixon
- U.S. v. Nixon established that a special prosecutor appointed by DOJ is a valid mechanism to compel evidence from the president.
- The Supreme Court ordered Nixon to turn over tapes to the special prosecutor, affirming the role's legitimacy.
Judge Cannon's Misunderstanding Of Special Counsel
- Judge Aileen Cannon questioned the legitimacy of the special counsel appointment in the Trump case despite settled law.
- Michael Popok says her lines of questioning showed a misapprehension of the special counsel framework.
Special Counsel Rule Limits DOJ Micromanagement
- 28 C.F.R. §600.1 creates an independent-feeling special counsel who is not micromanaged by DOJ day-to-day.
- The attorney general receives reports and can override recommendations while informing Congress if he does.