Robert Fripp and David Singleton discuss music analysis, trust, and their tour preparation. They touch on topics like family influence, dedication to music, abstaining from drugs, and their preference for margaritas. The podcast also explores their musical journey, the formation of King Crimson, struggles in the music industry, copyright ownership, pursuit of musical perfection, and reflections on relationships.
Self-producing 'In the Court of the Crimson King' marked King Crimson's success.
King Crimson's unique sound and live performances set them apart.
Fripp found success and freedom in the US music scene.
Legal battles over song rights have plagued Fripp and King Crimson.
Fripp emphasizes fair compensation for musicians amidst ownership disputes.
Deep dives
Creation of King Crimson
King Crimson began when Giles, Giles, and Fripp transitioned due to their unusual practice of funding the record themselves, leading them to abandon the initial recordings made with a producer due to creative differences. Their iconic album, 'In the Court of the Crimson King,' was eventually self-produced and proved immensely successful.
Musical Success and Live Performances
King Crimson quickly gained fame through their live performances, notably at the Hyde Park Festival in 1969 and the West Palm Beach Festival in the US. Their unique sound and stage presence set them apart as a groundbreaking band, which resonated strongly with audiences, solidifying their place in the music industry.
US Experience
The shift from England to the US in terms of music was marked by a notable sense of liberation for Fripp. The favorable environment in the US, especially in the late 60s and 70s, provided ample opportunities for success. Despite some antipathy towards progressive rock, King Crimson found strong support leading to significant growth and recognition.
Record Ownership Conflicts
Fripp has faced a prolonged legal battle over song rights and copyrights, owning the recordings and copyrights personally after years of litigation and disputes. The complex nature of the music industry's ownership rights has led to ongoing challenges and conflicts over who rightfully owns and controls the music.
Historical Business Controversy
Fripp acknowledges feeling ripped off during the earlier years of King Crimson due to deceptive practices by management. A specific incident in 1976 involving misrepresentation of copyright ownership sparked a six-year legal battle in 1991 when the issue resurfaced around the sale of King Crimson copyrights to BMG Music Publishing and Virgin Records.
Evolution of Musical Style and Industry Impact
King Crimson's unique sound and progressive rock style set them apart in the music industry, resonating strongly with audiences. Despite facing challenges and disputes over ownership rights, their influential albums and live performances have solidified their place as a groundbreaking and iconic band in the music industry.
Future of King Crimson
Despite past challenges and ownership disputes, King Crimson's enduring legacy remains strong. Their innovative music and impactful presence in the industry continue to inspire fans and musicians alike. Fripp's persistent efforts in navigating complex legal battles reflect his commitment to preserving the band's musical integrity and legacy.
Robert Fripp's Legal Battle and Rights Ownership
Robert Fripp discusses his legal battle over music rights, emphasizing the importance of both money and equity. He shares examples where original King Crimson members weren't paid and expresses his determination to ensure fair compensation to musicians. Fripp recounts the ownership dispute resolved in the early 2000s, highlighting ongoing challenges with major labels and licensing.
Robert Fripp's Musical Practice and Calisthenic Focus
Fripp delves into his meticulous musical practice, focusing on calisthenic reliability for performances. He explains the demands of maintaining an athletic level of playing as he ages, emphasizing the importance of discipline and physical training. Fripp highlights the constant evolution in his approach to maintaining performance quality and acknowledges the impact of experience on his musical expressions.
Live Performances vs. Recordings and Legacy Considerations
Fripp contrasts the permanence of recordings with the evanescent nature of live performances, drawing an analogy to gardening. He underscores the significance of live music experiences and the ephemeral quality of performances. Additionally, Fripp reflects on legacy, expressing a commitment to preserving the King Crimson archive and acknowledging the enduring impact of music beyond the music industry's constraints.
