In this lively discussion, John Podhoretz, a prominent political commentator known for his sharp insights, joins Jonah to explore the joys of intellectual schadenfreude. They dissect Kamala Harris's political strategy and the peculiar definition of 'weird' in today's politics. The conversation includes a critique of the lack of outrage over antisemitism within the Democrats and wraps up with a deep dive into the assassination of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh, connecting it to broader U.S. foreign policy concerns in the Middle East.
The episode explores the concept of intellectual schadenfreude, highlighting the peculiar enjoyment pundits derive from political missteps and flip-flopping.
Jonah and John critique the Democratic Party's handling of antisemitism, contrasting it with Republican responses to similar accusations of bigotry.
The discussion emphasizes how international events, like the assassination of Hamas leaders, can significantly influence domestic political discourse and strategy.
Deep dives
Unexpected Podcast Transition
The discussion begins with the host expressing excitement over an unplanned episode, which stemmed from a cancellation. Initially, the plan was to have a colleague discuss climate change, but a last-minute emergency forced a change in topic. This led to a spontaneous reaction to various political events, particularly around the evolving dynamics within the Democratic Party, which the host finds both entertaining and alarming. The episode highlights the current political climate, where unexpected situations can lead to unfiltered commentary on prominent figures like Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.
Spectating the Political Arena
The speakers reflect on their detachment from the ongoing political dilemmas, likening themselves to spectators in a grand show. They discuss the nihilistic entertainment that arises from witnessing political machinations, emphasizing that little of what is happening is beneficial for American politics. The conversation reveals a sense of cautious observation, where every meal on the metaphorical political menu feels unsatisfactory, but there is humor to be found in its presentation. This distance allows them to analyze the current landscape without being burdened by partisanship.
Conservative Rethinking of Flip-Flopping
A significant portion of the conversation revolves around the strategic implications of politicians' flip-flopping, particularly concerning Kamala Harris. The speakers argue that her shifts in policy could be interpreted positively from a conservative viewpoint, as they indicate an acknowledgment of previous mistakes. They suggest that this could align more closely with public opinion, particularly on critical issues like fracking. By framing these reversals as concessions, the discussion highlights the potential for a beneficial impact on national discourse.
Analyzing Political Messaging
The podcast delves into the messaging strategies of both political parties, examining how they handle contentious topics such as anti-Semitism and economic policies. The speakers draw attention to how the Democratic Party navigates complex issues surrounding its candidate selection while simultaneously critiquing the Republican response to accusations of bigotry. This dual standard in media coverage is pointed out, highlighting how issues are framed differently depending on party affiliation. By comparing reactions to candidates, they reflect on the broader ramifications of these narratives in the electoral landscape.
The Impact of International Events on Domestic Politics
The final segment focuses on the recent political assassinations abroad and their cascading effects on domestic political dynamics. The speakers discuss the significance of Israel's actions against Hamas leaders and how this aligns with or challenges U.S. foreign policy. They analyze potential responses from Kamala Harris and the communications surrounding international conflicts, emphasizing the delicate balance needed to navigate these issues politically. The conversation underscores the intricate interplay between international events and the implications they can have on domestic electoral strategies and public perceptions.
When Jonah finds himself in times of trouble, John Podhoretz comes on TheRemnant. The theme for today’s episode is something all pundits enjoy: the blissful embrace of intellectual schadenfreude. Jonah and John make the case for equivocation within the Harris campaign strategy, discuss the definition of weird and the be-clowning of Project 2025, and call out the astounding lack of outrage regarding the Democrats’ antisemitism problem. To close it all out, the duo covers the assassination of Ismail Haniyeh, the political head of Hamas.
The Remnant is a production of The Dispatch, a digital media company covering politics, policy, and culture from a non-partisan, conservative perspective. To access all of The Dispatch’s offerings—including Jonah’s G-File newsletter, weekly livestreams, and other members-only content—click here.