

Should Canada end animal testing in medical research?
Aug 21, 2025
Joining the discussion are Arthur Brown, a professor at Western University specializing in Anatomy and Cell Biology, Charu Chandrasekera, founder of the Canadian Centre for Alternatives to Animal Methods, and Andrew Fenton, a philosopher and animal bioethicist. They explore the scandal surrounding animal testing in Ontario, ethical implications of using animals in research, and the urgent need for innovative alternatives. The conversation emphasizes the tension between scientific advancement and animal welfare, urging a critical reassessment of current practices.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Public Outcry Drives Policy Reaction
- The St. Joseph's beagle report triggered political and public backlash leading to promises to ban dogs and cats in Ontario research.
- Emotional public response pressured officials despite institutional claims of approved ethics oversight.
Research Seeks Balance Between Human Benefit And Animal Care
- Arthur Brown argues animal studies aim to reduce human suffering and are balanced with concern for animal welfare.
- He emphasizes careful oversight and minimizing harm while pursuing scientific advances.
Whistleblower Review Revealed Shockingly Invasive Protocols
- Charu Chandrasekera reviewed nearly 100 pages of St. Joseph's protocols and was shocked by the invasiveness and limited human translatability.
- She noted similar human imaging research exists that could replace many animal studies.