Standing Issue in the Supreme Court Oral Arguments

The podcast delves into the Supreme Court oral arguments on the Mifeprex case, revealing glaring flaws in the plaintiffs' standing. Despite attempts by anti-abortion doctors to challenge FDA restrictions, the lack of evidence showcasing actual harm or injury faced by the doctors weakens their case. The discussion highlights procedural hurdles and the weight placed on hypothetical future scenarios, underscoring the importance of valid standing to regulate judiciary dynamics.