This Guy Sucked Carl Schmitt with Jonathan Fine *Unlocked*
15 snips
Oct 30, 2025 In this engaging discussion, Dr. Jonathan Fine, a Germanist and scholar of comparative literature, delves into the controversial legacy of Carl Schmitt. He explores Schmitt's state of exception theory and the dark implications of his friend-enemy distinction, linking them to political violence. Fine critiques Schmitt's rejection of liberal constitutionalism and highlights his continued influence on contemporary right-wing thinkers. The conversation serves as a stark reminder of Schmitt's problematic views and their relevance in today's political landscape.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
State Of Exception Is Political Technology
- Carl Schmitt popularized the state of exception as a legal tool to suspend normal laws during crises.
- He argued the sovereign is defined by the power to decide when that exception applies.
Politics As Friend‑Enemy Choice
- Schmitt framed the core political decision as the friend-enemy distinction rather than policy debates.
- He claimed genuine political enemies may require physical annihilation, placing violence at the center of politics.
Anti‑Liberalism Is Built Into His Theory
- Schmitt vigorously opposed liberal constitutionalism, legalism, and compromise as weaknesses.
- He argued decisive, non‑neutral leadership is necessary to respond to threats democracies mishandle.
