

Victor Davis Hanson: Iran Has Only One Negotiating Chip Left: Their Survival
Jun 23, 2025
Recent U.S. military actions in Iran have shifted the balance of power. With the loss of nuclear leverage, Iran must now reconsider its position for survival. Historical context shows that decades of conflict funding have resulted in little gain for Iran. The repercussions of these airstrikes could reshape regional stability and heighten tensions further. Speculation suggests that American and Israeli strategies may evolve drastically in response to Iran's diminished negotiating position.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Trump's Strategic Strike in Middle East
- President Trump ordered a precise military strike on Iran's nuclear sites using B-2 bombers and cruise missiles.
- This marked a departure from typical Middle East interventions, focusing on eliminating nuclear threats without ground invasion.
Unique Focus of Trump's Airstrike
- Past U.S. air campaigns in the Middle East often led to unintended chaos rather than stability.
- Trump's airstrike was uniquely targeted to stop Iran's nuclear program without pursuing regime change or invasion.
Iran's Heavy Losses in Proxy Wars
- Iran invested heavily in proxy groups and spent trillions through subsidies and sanctions losses.
- The recent strike destroyed much of those investments and deals a heavy blow to Iran's regional ambitions.