In this episode, Nitish Pahwa, tech writer covering the trial, discusses Sam Bankman Freed's testimony and defense strategy. Topics also include the lack of trust in his advisors, allegations of money misuse, and the relationship between FTX and Alameda Research.
The defense's argument that customers gave permission for FTX to use their deposits is unconvincing, as terms of service and instructions indicated otherwise.
Evidence suggests that the money borrowed from FTX by Alameda Research was used for personal investments, undermining the defense's claim of Sam's lack of awareness of fund mismanagement.
Deep dives
Sam Bankman Freed takes the stand in his own defense
Sam Bankman Freed, the founder and CEO of Cryptocurrency Exchange FTX, testified in his trial facing charges of fraud, money laundering, and conspiracy. The defense has relied on portraying Sam as someone who did nothing wrong, placing blame on his lawyers and colleagues for letting him down. However, this defense strategy is weak, and Sam's testimony is seen as a last-ditch effort to save his case.
FTX's treatment of customer assets under scrutiny
One of the key issues in the trial is how FTX handled customer assets. Sam denied using customer deposits, but the defense argued that customers had given their permission for FTX to use their deposits in case of financial instability. However, the defense's argument is seen as unconvincing, as terms of service and instructions from FTX indicated that customer assets should have been segregated and not used for personal purposes.
The relationship between FTX and Alameda Research
Another important aspect of the trial is the relationship between FTX and Alameda Research, FTX's sister hedge fund. Sam described Alameda as a market maker for FTX, but questions emerged around $8 billion borrowed from FTX by Alameda. While Sam tried to justify the use of Alameda as a substitute for lacking bank accounts, evidence suggested that the money was used for personal investments. The defense's argument that Sam was not aware of the mismanagement of funds is not convincing, especially given the investments in Larry David and the Miami Heat Stadium.
The man at the center of it all takes the stand in his own defense—but what’s left to say?
Guest: Nitish Pahwa, associate business and tech writer covering the trial for Slate.
If you enjoy this show, please consider signing up for Slate Plus. Slate Plus members get benefits like zero ads on any Slate podcast, bonus episodes of shows like Slow Burn and Dear Prudence—and you’ll be supporting the work we do here on What Next TBD. Sign up now at slate.com/whatnextplus to help support our work.