Kamala Harris, the U.S. Vice President, discusses her recent debate highlights against Donald Trump. Joining her are renowned singer-songwriter Taylor Swift and political heavyweights, Dick and Liz Cheney, who explore the unique power of celebrity endorsements in elections. Law professor Nathaniel Persily sheds light on election integrity and the impact of new voting laws. The conversation dives into the intersection of pop culture and politics, emphasizing the importance of emotional connection with voters and the evolving landscape of party support.
Kamala Harris effectively highlighted Trump's chaotic leadership style during the debate, showcasing her potential as a stable candidate for voters.
Endorsements for Harris from figures like Taylor Swift and the Cheneys signify the potential influence of celebrity endorsements on undecided voters.
Nate Persily underlines growing voter disillusionment and confusion surrounding election integrity, emphasizing its implications for turnout and electoral confidence.
Deep dives
Kamala Harris's Debate Performance
Kamala Harris is discussed as the perceived winner of the recent presidential debate, with commentators noting her effective strategy and command during the event. Despite the consensus that she performed well, there are questions about whether her performance will sway undecided voters, particularly within the seven swing states. Critics mention a lack of detailed policy discussions from Harris during the debate, suggesting that undecided voters may seek more substantive proposals to solidify their support. The debate encapsulated her ability to highlight Trump’s chaotic leadership style while promoting her own credibility as a candidate.
Trump's Chaotic Responses
The discussion highlights a moment when Trump reacted impulsively to Harris’s provocations during the debate, illustrating his struggle to maintain composure under pressure. His erratic comments, including a bizarre claim about immigrants eating pets, sparked reactions from commentators regarding his suitability for the presidency. This chaotic response serves to reinforce Harris’s campaign message, which is focused on presenting her as a stable alternative to Trump. Analysts emphasize that while Trump's supporters remain loyal, such performances could alienate moderate voters who may be turned off by his unpredictability.
Monumental Endorsements for Harris
The conversation transitions to notable endorsements of Kamala Harris, particularly from Taylor Swift and Liz Cheney, with emphasis on the potential impact of celebrity influence in politics. Taylor Swift, in particular, is highlighted for her strategic timing and respectful approach, encouraging her fans to register to vote and make informed decisions. Conversely, Liz and Dick Cheney’s endorsements are analyzed in terms of their historical context and the unexpectedness of former adversaries aligning against Trump. The significance of these endorsements raises questions about their ability to sway undecided voters and rekindle interest in the election.
Election Day Concerns
Nate Persley joins the discussion to address various threats to the upcoming election, focusing on confusion and chaos rather than traditional concerns like voter suppression or fraud. He notes the loss of confidence in the electoral process among nearly a third of voters, possibly complicating the administration of elections in several states. Persley highlights specific situations, such as changes in voting laws and ongoing legal challenges that could create uncertainty on election day. He expresses concern over the potential for these issues to exacerbate tensions and lead to heightened scrutiny of the electoral process.
Public Sentiment About Politics
Acknowledging the general disillusionment with politics that many voters experience, the discussion raises critical questions about how this affects voter turnout and engagement. The panel deliberates on whether Trump's chaotic political style has made people more cynical about government, potentially hindering participation in the electoral process. They emphasize the importance of understanding how political messaging resonates with voters who might feel disenchanted. The conversation concludes with the suggestion that changing voter sentiment could play a significant role in the upcoming election results.
This week, Emily Bazelon, John Dickerson, and David Plotz discuss Kamala Harris’ win against Donald Trump in the presidential debate; the Harris endorsements by Taylor Swift and Dick and Liz Cheney; and election integrity with Professor Nathaniel Persily of Stanford Law School.
Email your chatters, questions, and comments to gabfest@slate.com. (Messages may be referenced by name unless the writer stipulates otherwise.)
Podcast production by Cheyna Roth
Research by Julie Huygen
Public.com+Public Investing Disclosure: Public Investing offers a High-Yield Cash Account where funds from this account are automatically deposited into partner banks where they earn interest and are eligible for FDIC insurance; Public Investing is not a bank. See public.com/#disclosures-main for more information.