Leon Brenner, author of "The Autistic Subject: on the Threshold of Language," discusses the Autistic Rim, the drive circuit, and the various modalities of language in autism. They explore the relationship between the Autistic Rim and the Drive, the concept of the Drive Object, and the autistic linguistic spectrum. They also delve into language use in autism, examining the pseudo-signifier and Lacanian views on desire.
There are different modalities of the rim in autism, representing different ways in which language is used by autistic individuals.
The synthetic other, unlike the big other, is the locus where linguistic inscriptions take place in autistic subjects, allowing for the construction of a neo-rim and a unique form of psychic dynamism.
The treatment of autism should be individualized, recognizing the subjective aims, inventions, and unique linguistic functionality of each autistic individual, challenging normative and evolutionary developmental models.
Deep dives
The Different Modalities of the Rim
There are different modalities of the rim in autism, which include the no rim, the protective rim, the dynamic rim, and the hollowing out of the rim. These modalities represent different ways in which language is used by autistic individuals. The no rim refers to the absence of a drive circuit and the inability to symbolically inscribe the drive object. The protective rim involves using language for protection from invasions of drive stimuli. The dynamic rim entails using language for dynamic aims, such as mediating bodily functions and social interactions. The hollowing out of the rim involves the lack of symbolic inscription of the erogenous zones, resulting in an aimless movement of the drive circuit. These modalities are not a linear developmental progression, but rather represent different ways in which language can be utilized by autistic individuals.
The Synthetic Other and Pseudo-Signifiers
The synthetic other is the locus where linguistics inscriptions take place in autistic subjects. It is a matrix of sign and referent, unlike the big other, which is associated with the locus of signifiers. Autistic individuals may use pseudo-signifiers, which involve interposing signs to form new linguistic units. These pseudo-signifiers provide a means of bridge or compensation for the disjunction between intellectual and affective experiences in autism. The use of pseudo-signifiers can lead to the construction of a neo-rim, which enables a unique form of psychic dynamism. This approach challenges the notion of a predetermined trajectory in the treatment of autism and emphasizes the individualized nature of language use and its potential for facilitating satisfaction and freedom in autistic individuals.
No Evolutionary Development
The different modalities of the rim in autism do not represent an evolutionary developmental progression. There is no predetermined aim or trajectory in the treatment of autism, and each case is unique. The aim of the treatment is determined by the individual and their own inventions and linguistic functionality. The transparent pole represents an open-ended spectrum of autistic experience, where individuals may not even be diagnosed as autistic but still exhibit unique aspects of autistic linguistic functioning. The emphasis is on individualized treatment and the recognition of the individual's subjective aims and inventions.
The Connection to Lacanian Concepts
The different modalities of the rim and the approach to autism in this summary are in line with Lacanian concepts such as the lack of a predetermined aim in treatment, the importance of individual subjective experience, and the rejection of normative or evolutionary developmental models. The emphasis is on the unique linguistic functionality and inventive capabilities of autistic individuals, allowing for a flexible and tailored approach to treatment.
Conclusion
The summary explores the different modalities of the rim in autism, representing different ways in which language is used by autistic individuals. These modalities include the no rim, protective rim, dynamic rim, and hollowing out of the rim. The approach challenges normative and developmental models of autism, emphasizing individualized treatment and the recognition of the unique linguistic functionality and inventive capabilities of autistic individuals. The transparent pole represents an open-ended spectrum of autistic experience, where there is no predetermined aim or trajectory in treatment.
Leon Brenner, Author of The Autistic Subject: on the Threshold of Language joined us again this week to pick up on a discussion of the drive circuit, the synthetic other, and the various modalities of the rim.
https://www.palgrave.com/gp/book/9783030507145
https://leonbrenner.com/
https://twitter.com/leonbrennercom?lang=en
Support us on Patreon:
https://www.patreon.com/muhh
Twitter: @unconscioushh
Instagram: @unconscioushh
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode