LessWrong (Curated & Popular) “Good Research Takes are Not Sufficient for Good Strategic Takes” by Neel Nanda
Mar 23, 2025
Neel Nanda, an author known for his insights on AGI safety, discusses the crucial distinction between research skills and strategic thinking. He emphasizes that strong research credentials don’t always translate to effective strategic insight, especially in complex fields like AGI safety. Nanda highlights the need for diverse expertise and critical thinking, challenging the common misconception that researchers are inherently equipped to tackle big-picture questions. His observations stir an important conversation about the true skills needed for impactful strategic decision-making.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Research vs. Strategy
- Research skills don't guarantee strategic thinking abilities.
- Strategic thinking requires distinct skills, like handling a lack of feedback.
Strategic Thinking in AI Safety
- Good strategic thinking is hard, especially with complex issues like AI safety.
- It needs clear thinking in a field with conflicting opinions and simplistic models.
Developing Strategic Thinking
- Cultivate clear thinking, especially if your research involves easy wins.
- Groundbreaking research is better evidence, but not sufficient for strategic skills.