Martin Griffiths: Can the humanitarian system survive?
Sep 23, 2024
auto_awesome
In this insightful discussion, Martin Griffiths, former UN Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs, shares his extensive experience in conflict zones. He highlights the dire humanitarian crisis in Sudan, where 25 million people urgently need aid, emphasizing the neglect from powerful nations. Griffiths also navigates ethical dilemmas faced when engaging groups like the Taliban in humanitarian efforts. Lastly, he speaks on the stark funding challenges for aid organizations and the critical need for ongoing support to foster peace in conflict areas.
The humanitarian crisis in Sudan is dire, with 25 million people in need, exacerbated by famine and inadequate international response.
Martin Griffiths emphasizes the necessity of engaging all conflict parties, including adversaries, to ensure humanitarian aid reaches those in need.
Deep dives
Humanitarian Crisis in Sudan
Sudan is experiencing a catastrophic humanitarian crisis, with 25 million people in need of support due to civil war and famine. The situation is particularly dire as famine has been formally declared, marking the first occurrence of such a declaration since 2017. The former UN humanitarian chief warns that the level of need in Sudan could become worse than the Ethiopian famine of the 1980s, where the world saw significant loss of life and suffering. The lack of media access and funding severely complicates the ability to respond to the crisis effectively, illustrating a failure of the international community to prioritize this urgent situation.
Global Response and Accountability
The response from powerful nations to crises like that in Sudan has been criticized for being inadequate and motivated by self-interest rather than humanitarian obligation. With military expenditures rising above $2 trillion, humanitarian funding has significantly declined, highlighting a stark imbalance in global priorities. The former UN humanitarian chief emphasizes the need for a coalition of leverage from nations involved in the conflict, urging them to prioritize humanitarian access over political and military strategies. The insight suggests that without significant pressure from these global powers, the humanitarian aid system may falter in effectively addressing such crises.
Mediation and Engagement in Conflict Zones
Navigating the challenges of humanitarian work in conflict zones requires bold engagement with all parties, including those viewed as adversaries. The former UN humanitarian chief explained that avoiding dialogue with leaders, like those in the Taliban or Syrian regime, means abandoning those in need. He advocates for continual engagement to ensure aid reaches those who require it, rather than conceding to the decisions of those causing suffering. This approach underscores a commitment to humanitarian principles, prioritizing the well-being of affected populations over political legitimacy.
Mishal Husain speaks to Martin Griffiths, who worked for decades within the UN and the wider world of humanitarian aid. From Cambodia to Afghanistan, Sudan to Gaza, he has seen it all. How does he make sense of the inequalities and the suffering, and how does he think the aid system can survive, with funding ever more squeezed?
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode