Michael Rembis, "Writing Mad Lives in the Age of the Asylum" (Oxford UP, 2025)
Feb 9, 2025
auto_awesome
Michael Rembis, a history professor and director at the Center for Disability Studies, dives into the often hidden narratives of asylum inmates from 1830 to 1950. He reveals their writings that challenge the image of asylums as mere medical facilities, exposing them as venues of violence and abuse. Rembis highlights the impact of mad writers advocating for change, illustrating how their personal stories influenced perceptions of madness and mental health reforms. The discussion uncovers the struggle between medical authority and the voices of those labeled as mad.
The podcast emphasizes the importance of personal narratives from mad writers, revealing their overlooked experiences within the asylum system.
It discusses the systemic violence in asylums, highlighting that mad individuals were often victims rather than perpetrators of violence.
Deep dives
Understanding the Focus on Madness and Mad Writers
The discussion centers on the significance of studying madness and the perspectives of mad writers, emphasizing the historical neglect of their voices in narratives typically dominated by institutional accounts. Researchers have often overlooked the personal experiences of individuals labeled as mad, focusing instead on institutional histories authored by administrators and medical professionals. This work aims to uncover the lived experiences of those committed to asylums, providing a much-needed perspective that recognizes the agency and authorship of mad writers. The speaker highlights the importance of valuing these personal narratives as crucial contributions to the broader understanding of disability history.
The Role of Violence in Asylum Commitments
The exploration of violence within the asylum system reveals a complex interplay between societal perceptions and the realities faced by mad writers. Historical narratives have often implied a direct link between madness and violence, with physicians propagating these connections to justify the expansion of the asylum system. However, while violence may have been discussed extensively, it was typically the mad individuals who were victims rather than perpetrators. The speaker argues for a reconsideration of these historical frameworks, emphasizing that much of the violence experienced was a result of the asylum system itself rather than the individuals it labeled as mad.
Writing as Labor and Advocacy
The podcast highlights the significant emotional and physical labor involved in the writing of mad writers as a form of advocacy for their rights and experiences. Writing was not just a means of self-expression; it served as a vital tool for social change and reform within the asylum system. Many mad writers dedicated their lives to this advocacy, seeking to reshape public narratives around madness and challenge systemic abuses. The efforts of these writers often created a dialogue that connected their personal struggles with broader social movements aimed at reforming the treatment of individuals labeled as mentally ill.
Building Community and Support Networks
The formation of supportive relationships among mad writers and fellow inmates played a crucial role in their resilience and survival during and after their asylum experiences. These connections often transcended social and class boundaries, fostering a sense of solidarity and shared purpose among those impacted by the asylum system. After leaving asylums, many individuals maintained these bonds, using their collective experiences to advocate for reform while also assisting one another in re-integrating into society. The emphasis on mutual aid and community underscores the significant networks of support that emerged in response to the systemic violence and isolation associated with mental health institutions.
The asylum--at once a place of refuge, incarceration, and abuse--touched the lives of many Americans living between 1830 and 1950. What began as a few scattered institutions in the mid-eighteenth century grew to 579 public and private asylums by the 1940s. About one out of every 280 Americans was an inmate in an asylum at an annual cost to taxpayers of approximately $200 million.
Using the writing of former asylum inmates, as well as other sources, Writing Mad Lives in the Age of the Asylum(Oxford UP, 2025) reveals a history of madness and the asylum that has remained hidden by a focus on doctors, diagnoses, and other interventions into mad people's lives. Although those details are present in this story, its focus is the hundreds of inmates who spoke out or published pamphlets, memorials, memoirs, and articles about their experiences. They recalled physical beatings and prolonged restraint and isolation. They described what it felt like to be gawked at like animals by visitors and the hardships they faced re-entering the community. Many inmates argued that asylums were more akin to prisons than medical facilities and testified before state legislatures and the US Congress, lobbying for reforms to what became popularly known as "lunacy laws."
Michael Rembis demonstrates how their stories influenced popular, legal, and medical conceptualizations of madness and the asylum at a time when most Americans seemed to be groping toward a more modern understanding of the many different forms of "insanity." The result is a clearer sense of the role of mad people and their allies in shaping one of the largest state expenditures in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries--and, at the same time, a recovery of the social and political agency of these vibrant and dynamic "mad writers."