

Epic v. Apple judge rules that Apple must allow other forms of in-app purchases
Sep 11, 2021
Adi Robertson, a Technology journalist at The Verge and expert on the Epic v. Apple trial, joins the discussion on a landmark court ruling. The highlights include the judge's critical view of Apple's in-app purchase policies and the implications for developers regarding alternative payment methods. They delve into the challenges of defining monopolistic behavior and how this ruling may influence future app store regulations. The conversation also addresses Apple's security justifications and ongoing tensions with Epic Games, hinting at a lengthy legal saga ahead.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Injunction Against Apple
- Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers issued an injunction against Apple's anti-steering rule.
- This prevents Apple from stopping developers linking to external purchasing methods.
Injunction's Scope
- The injunction allows developers to inform users of alternative payment options.
- In-app purchases are still required, but external sign-up options can be promoted.
Buttons vs. Links
- The court's interpretation of "button" vs. "link" impacts in-app purchases.
- Developers may find ways to use this to bypass Apple's payment system.