The New Statesman: politics and culture Shabana Mahmood's asylum plans split Labour
Nov 17, 2025
Political journalist Ethan Croft joins to dissect Shabana Mahmood's controversial asylum proposals, including 20-year settlement waits and asset seizure. They explore Labour's divided response, with backlash from MPs and the implications of tightening Articles 3 and 8. Croft highlights the influence of tabloid sensationalism on public opinion and reflects on the internal Labour factions that support tougher measures. As they analyze Mahmood's rhetoric and cross-party reactions, the political landscape reveals a complex push and pull on immigration policy.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
ECHR Reinterpretation As A Workaround
- Shabana Mahmood proposes tightening ECHR Article 3 and Article 8 interpretations to limit judicial blocks on deportations.
- She aims to preserve ECHR membership while narrowing judicial scope via domestic law and Council of Europe engagement.
Narrowing 'Degrading Treatment' And Family Rights
- Mahmood argues Article 3's 'degrading treatment' is too broad and blocks deportations for poor prison conditions or mental-health provision.
- She wants judges to interpret family rights narrowly under Article 8 to limit wide claims keeping people in the UK.
Public Dissent Within Labour
- Early reactions show 18 Labour MPs publicly opposing the plans, a small but notable public rebellion.
- Many more MPs are privately uneasy and waiting for full legislation before deciding.