More Perfect
No More Souters - Revisited
May 9, 2025
In this thought-provoking discussion, Kermit Roosevelt III, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania School of Law and a former clerk for Justice Souter, delves into the enigmatic life of the late Supreme Court Justice David Souter. They explore Souter's unexpected judicial philosophy that contradicted conservative expectations and shaped major cases like Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey. The conversation also examines the political implications of his nomination and the lasting legacy he left on the Court, as well as the broader impacts of his decisions in a polarized landscape.
49:07
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- Justice Souter's unexpected liberal rulings, particularly in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, transformed perceptions of judicial appointments and sparked Republican demands for stricter vetting.
- His commitment to 'stare decisis' emphasized the importance of upholding precedent, revealing a complex relationship between personal philosophy and the impact on societal stability.
Deep dives
The Enigma of Justice Souter
Justice David Souter is characterized as an enigmatic figure on the Supreme Court, known for his reclusive nature and avoidance of public life. This behavior has led to a fascination with his personal habits, such as his unusual diet, which included eating apple cores, and his preference for writing in longhand with fountain pens. His elusive personality contributed to a perception of him as a 'mystery,' and he rarely gave interviews, leaving both journalists and the public eager to uncover more about him. This combination of quirks and secrecy turned Souter into a notable and almost celebrity-like figure within the context of the Supreme Court.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
