Reforming State and Local Economic Development Subsidies
Oct 1, 2024
auto_awesome
Marc Joffe, an expert on economic development strategies, shares insights into how states can rethink their approach to business subsidies. He tackles the detrimental effects of competitive subsidies that burden taxpayers and outlines the role of site consultants in this system. Joffe discusses potential reforms that promote transparency and interstate cooperation, drawing on rivalries like that between Kansas and Missouri. He encourages lawmakers to reevaluate subsidy models, advocating for a more thoughtful approach to attract businesses without unsustainable costs.
The competition among states for business subsidies creates a negative impact on taxpayers and reduces economic efficiency.
Interstate compacts can help states collaborate to eliminate subsidy wars, promoting competition based on genuine advantages instead.
Deep dives
The Cost of Incentive Warfare
The practice of cities and states engaging in incentive warfare to attract businesses is critiqued for its negative impact on taxpayers and overall economic efficiency. The competition often leads to substantial subsidies being offered to large corporations, creating a transfer of wealth from the public to private entities, without guaranteeing long-term benefits such as job creation or economic growth. This dynamic creates a deadweight loss, as funds spent on these incentives could be better allocated to public services or infrastructure. Transparency is proposed as a key reform, allowing citizens to understand the financial costs associated with these incentives, thereby generating public pressure to reconsider and potentially reduce such practices.
Alternatives to Subsidies: Interstate Compacts
One innovative solution put forth is the concept of interstate compacts, where neighboring states collaborate to eliminate competitive bidding for companies through incentives. By agreeing not to offer subsidies to attract businesses from one another, states could foster a healthier economic environment based on real competitive advantages, such as regulatory quality and infrastructure. An example discussed involves the Kansas and Missouri partnership attempting to curb the competitive incentive game over the Kansas City region. This cooperative approach, if widely adopted, could redirect the focus towards fundamental strengths that genuinely attract businesses without the drawbacks of subsidy warfare.
Offering subsidies is how many states show interest in bringing in a new business enterprise and states regularly try to offer more than other states can, but it doesn't have to be that way. Marc Joffe explains how states can get out of the trap of playing the subsidies game against their neighbors.