Dr. Tyler McNabb explores how cognitive biases may shape our understanding of classical theism, raising concerns about its alignment with human intuitions.
The podcast discusses the evolutionary origins of religious beliefs, suggesting that cognitive processes promoting survival may inherently predispose humans towards belief in divinity.
Deep dives
Introduction to Dr. Tyler McNabb and His Work
Dr. Tyler McNabb is an associate professor of philosophy at the University of St. Joseph in Macau, where he specializes in religious epistemology, functionalism, and reformed epistemology. Recently, he has focused on defending classical theism and exploring its compatibility with other traditions, such as Buddhism. He is set to release a book discussing this relationship and has presented a paper on how cognitive science correlates with classical theism. His work aims to bridge the gap between philosophical inquiry and religious beliefs, presenting them as potentially harmonious rather than conflicting.
The Concept of Theism Tracking
The concept of 'theism tracking' highlights the concern that cognitive biases may affect our understanding and intuitions about God. Critics argue that classical theism doesn't align with our natural dispositions, as intuitions about God's characteristics seem to favor neoclassical or open theistic models over classical ones. The discussion centers on whether our cognitive systems accurately lead us to a theologically correct notion of God, or if they reflect flawed beliefs. This exploration raises questions about the reliability of our cognitive faculties in forming religious concepts, suggesting that a re-evaluation is necessary when considering classical theism.
Cognitive Science and Religious Belief
Cognitive science posits that religious beliefs may be an evolutionary spandrel, arising as byproducts of cognitive processes aimed at survival. Research shows that humans have a tendency to attribute agency and purpose to natural phenomena, which suggests an inherent predisposition to believe in higher powers. Various sociological studies have shown that even educated individuals revert to teleological reasoning when prompted quickly, indicating an innate inclination towards belief in the divine. This evolutionary perspective challenges classical theism, prompting the need for a better understanding of how these innate biases inform our spiritual beliefs.
Reliability of Cognitive Facets and Broader Implications
The discourse emphasizes that while cognitive faculties may not narrowly track theism in a classical sense, they still provide a broad awareness of divine realities. The reliability of cognition can allow for general beliefs in divinity, suggesting that even diverse cultural interpretations stem from similar underlying intuition. The necessity of using social cooperation, philosophy, and argumentation to refine beliefs and improve accuracy is acknowledged as an important aspect of understanding divinity. Ultimately, the conversation advocates for a balanced view that recognizes general reliability in cognitive formation while remaining open to deeper philosophical investigation.
Pat is joined by Dr. Tyler McNabb to discuss epistemology, cognitive science of religion, classical theism, and, time permitting, the simulation hypothesis!
