Wharton Business Daily
Who Should Moderate Social Media Content?
Jul 1, 2024
Wharton professor Pinar Yildirim discusses the Supreme Court's ruling on social media content moderation, addressing the challenges of misinformation regulation and the balance between safeguarding users and government intervention. The podcast explores the impact of AI-generated content and ongoing debates on content moderation regulations.
11:39
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- The Supreme Court's ruling restricts bankruptcy court authority in protecting opioid victims' legal claims against the Sackler family.
- Debates on balancing free speech and public well-being highlight challenges in regulating social media content moderation.
Deep dives
Supreme Court Rules Against Purdue Pharma and Sackler Family Bankruptcy
The Supreme Court ruled against Purdue Pharma and the Sackler family's bankruptcy reorganization settlement, which would have provided legal protections. The court voted five to four, stating the bankruptcy court lacked authority to release the Sackler family from legal claims made by opioid victims.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
