The Landscape
What the results of the election mean for public lands
Nov 25, 2024
Jennifer Rokala, Executive Director of the Center for Western Priorities, and Curtis Hubbard, a seasoned political consultant from Colorado, dive into the implications of the recent election results on public lands. They discuss the threatening tides of fossil fuel policies and Project 2025's potential overhaul of public land management. The duo emphasizes the importance of community involvement in conservation, navigating political challenges, and the risks of unqualified oversight. Tune in for insights on how these political shifts could transform America's treasured landscapes!
34:00
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- The election results indicate a divided electorate, highlighting the need for public engagement to preserve public lands against aggressive extractive policies.
- The conservation community's past successes in combating threats to national monuments underscore the importance of unified grassroots movements and public opposition in future advocacy efforts.
Deep dives
Election Outcomes and Public Lands Implications
The recent election results have significant implications for public lands, particularly in light of the expected policies from the Trump administration. Despite winning, Curtis emphasizes that Trump’s mandate is more nuanced, as nearly 49% of voters opposed his policies, indicating a divided electorate. The notion of Project 2025 is highlighted as a crucial blueprint for the administration, which aims to give extractive industries greater access to public lands, including potential reviews of national monuments. The uncertainty surrounding public land protections raises concerns, as past attacks on national monuments and fossil fuel exploitation could resurface under the new administration.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
