Raging Moderates with Scott Galloway and Jessica Tarlov Can the DOJ Conceal Parts of the Epstein Files?
66 snips
Nov 21, 2025 Join political commentator Aaron Parnas as he dives into the implications of the recently passed Epstein files bill. He reveals chilling insights into the content of the files and the survivors' quest for justice. The conversation takes a turn to discuss Trump's alarming rhetoric on Truth Social and what it means for his influence. Aaron also analyzes midterm election dynamics, touching on the potential shifts in Texas redistricting. Expect engaging commentary and sharp analysis from one of today’s most intriguing voices in politics!
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Legal Loopholes For Withholding Files
- The DOJ can cite “national security” or “ongoing investigation” to withhold Epstein files despite the Transparency Act.
- Pam Bondi must publish non-classified explanations for redactions, so some transparency is still required.
Demand Public Explanations For Redactions
- Watch for Pam Bondi’s public explanations each time she redacts or withholds documents.
- Use those explanations to hold officials accountable since they must be unclassified and public.
Contents Likely Graphic And Linking Power
- Most Epstein files likely contain graphic child sexual abuse material that cannot be publicly released for good reason.
- The files mainly show Epstein as a conduit connecting many powerful people, but indictments of those people are uncertain.