A discussion on ongoing legal trials involving Donald Trump, including fraud prosecution, defamation trial, vote subversion allegations, Stormy Daniels' hush money payments, and collection of classified documents. An analysis of the Eileen Cannon case, its potential consequences, and judge's temporary suspension of discovery issues. Challenges of navigating overwhelming news, implications of incendiary posts, and analyzing Trump's defense strategy. Concern over MAGA ideology and constitutional lawyering.
53:07
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
Fannie Willis's lawsuit in Fulton County, Georgia, poses a significant threat to Trump and his alleged co-conspirators.
Trump's defense strategies, as outlined in his motions to dismiss the January 6 prosecution in Washington, D.C., are weak and flawed.
Deep dives
Summary of the Podcast Episode
In this podcast episode, the host discusses the ongoing legal challenges facing former President Donald Trump. The episode covers various cases, including the New York State fraud prosecution of the Trump Organization, the defamation trial involving E. Jean Carroll, the corruption and election interference charges in Georgia, and the upcoming federal case related to the events of January 6th. The host also examines Trump's defense strategies, including arguments based on the First Amendment, selective prosecution, impeachment acquittal, and statutory claims. Overall, the episode highlights the legal battles and their potential implications for Trump and the MAGA movement.
Fannie Willis's Case in Georgia
Fannie Willis's lawsuit in Fulton County, Georgia, is a significant threat to Trump and his alleged co-conspirators. With the recent guilty pleas from key players like Sidney Powell and Kenneth Chesbro, Willis is demonstrating clarity and purpose in her pursuit of accountability. The cooperation of these individuals as witnesses against Trump poses a major challenge for his defense.
Trump's Defense Strategies
Trump's defense strategies, as outlined in his motions to dismiss the January 6 prosecution in Washington, D.C., are weak and flawed. His arguments based on free speech rights, selective prosecution, impeachment acquittal, and statutory claims are not convincing legally. Legal experts have criticized these defense tactics as lacking credibility and potentially sanctionable by the court.
The Speaker's Race and the Future Impact
The recent selection of Mike Johnson as Speaker of the House signals the ascendance of the MAGA wing of the Republican Party and the continued influence of Trump's ideology. Johnson's politeness and veneer of constitutional law expertise make him a potentially influential figure. However, concerns arise regarding his extremist views and the potential erosion of the constitutional principles he purports to defend.
On this week’s show, Dahlia Lithwick is joined by Slate’s Jurisprudence Editor, Jeremy Stahl. Jeremy is also the lucky person tasked with helming Slate’s coverage of the many many criminal and civil trials of Donald J Trump and Amicus listeners can expect to hear a lot from Jeremy over the next year. After a week of big news across a number of the former President’s courtroom battles, Jeremy gives us a survey of the legal landscape and some vital pointers about what really matters, what’s nonsense, and what we should be watching and listening for in the coming weeks.
In this week’s Amicus Plus segment, Jeremy Stahl sticks around to have a behind the scenes chat about how Slate’s jurisprudence team is tackling the thorny issue of reporting on the Trump trial - sorting wheat from chaff and stakes from horse race.