Danny Danon, former Ambassador to the UN from Israel, brings a wealth of experience to the discussion on the recent Israel/Hamas ceasefire. He clarifies that this is not a peace agreement, as Israel retains the right to respond to Hamas. Danon emphasizes the need to prioritize recovering hostages while remaining committed to national security. The conversation also touches on the political ramifications of this conflict and the broader geopolitical implications for the Middle East, including the ongoing threats from Iran.
President Biden's attempts to amend the Constitution via executive action highlight a troubling disregard for established legal processes and norms.
The dialogue surrounding the Israel/Hamas ceasefire indicates a commitment to military action, emphasizing the need for strong defense against threats.
Critics assert that the perceived failures in U.S. immigration policy stem from poor enforcement rather than the inadequacy of existing laws.
Deep dives
Financial Investments Post-Election
The speaker discusses the practice of reevaluating personal financial investments after presidential elections. Emphasizing the importance of financial protection, he advocates for investing in gold as a stable asset. He expresses trust in Advantage Gold, suggesting it as a top choice for potential investors looking to secure their wealth amid economic uncertainties. By calling Advantage Gold directly, individuals can request a free gold investment kit and may qualify for additional offers, such as free silver.
Critique of Biden's Presidency
The speaker expresses disdain for President Biden's administration, referring to it as 'the hideous, heinous, outrageous Biden regime.' He criticizes Biden for allegedly attempting to amend the Constitution through executive actions, specifically regarding the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA). Highlighting that such actions are deemed laughable, the speaker points out that constitutional amendments require a formal process, which Biden's claims do not adhere to. This perspective underlines a belief that the president is unqualified for his role.
Legal and Constitutional Ramifications of the ERA
The ongoing debate surrounding the ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment is examined, particularly the position that the amendment had already failed to meet the necessary state support within the stipulated deadline. Legal opinions from both previous and current administrations highlight the challenges of ratifying constitutional amendments retroactively. The speaker criticizes not only the Biden administration's interpretation of the ERA's status but also points out various organizations, including the American Bar Association, for their support of this interpretation despite its lack of precedent. This commentary raises questions about the broader implications of such legal interpretations on constitutional law.
Biden's Handling of the Rule of Law
The speaker paints a grim picture of President Biden's commitment to upholding the rule of law, citing various instances where he believes Biden has ignored or flouted legal standards. Issues ranging from immigration policies to Supreme Court rulings are highlighted, suggesting a pattern of lawlessness. The discussion further critiques Biden's relationship with foreign entities, implying that his decisions are influenced by outside factors, including financial ties to adversarial nations. This portrayal contributes to the narrative of a disconnect between Biden's actions and the expectations of lawful governance.
International Relations and Military Matters
In discussing U.S. foreign relations, the speaker emphasizes the necessity of a strong stance against countries like Iran, asserting that they pose a direct threat not only to Israel but also to regional stability. The commentary further outlines Israel's determination to neutralize Hamas, with assurances that the U.S. will support military actions as needed. He expresses skepticism towards efforts to broker peace with groups that do not genuinely seek coexistence, reinforcing the notion that such negotiations are futile without serious commitment from both sides. This viewpoint underscores a belief in the need for unwavering support of military strength in diplomacy.
Crisis in American Borders and Immigration
The speaker contends that there is a significant lack of understanding regarding American immigration laws, framing the problem as one of mismanagement rather than inadequate legislation. He argues that the existing laws are robust but are not being enforced effectively by the current administration. Furthermore, he critiques the push for new immigration laws, suggesting that the agenda of some lawmakers is more about altering legal frameworks to suit political objectives rather than addressing the actual problems at the border. This perspective advocates for reinforcing existing regulations rather than creating new statutes.
On Friday’s Mark Levin Show, President Biden can’t leave the office quick enough. He now claims to have amended the Constitution. Biden announced that the Equal Rights Amendment is the “law of the land,” despite the Justice Department and the U.S. archivist saying the President could not ratify the Constitutional amendment. Biden is lawless then he lectures us about the rule of law. According to Democrats, you can do anything if it’s in pursuit of the radical left agenda. Also, Ambassador Danny Danon calls in to discuss the Israel/Hamas ceasefire. This is not a peace agreement; Israel keeps the right to go into Gaza and finish off Hamas if necessary. Danon says they are determined to finish the job but will pause to get the hostages back. Later, Democrats keep telling us we have to fix our immigration laws, but they’re not broken. We have very detailed immigration laws which work if they are enforced. The problem is Democrats lack of virtue and lack of execution - its intentional. It will be important to have a Governor in the DHS position – Kristi Noem will be fantastic. Afterward, a unanimous Supreme Court upheld the TikTok ban. It can still survive; it just needs new American ownership. We can’t allow China to control Americans' data.
