Ada Palmer, "Inventing the Renaissance: The Myth of a Golden Age" (U Chicago Press, 2025)
Feb 13, 2025
auto_awesome
In this engaging discussion, Ada Palmer, an Associate Professor of History at the University of Chicago and noted novelist, dismantles the popular myths surrounding the Renaissance. She argues that the era was not a golden age but a complex period fraught with conflict and nostalgia for a lost Roman Empire. Palmer critiques how later historians shaped a romanticized view, revealing the diverse and fragile lives of Renaissance figures. The talk also touches on themes of nationalism and the importance of interdisciplinary approaches in re-evaluating historical narratives.
Ada Palmer critiques the traditional portrayal of the Renaissance as a 'golden age,' arguing it oversimplifies the complexities of historical development.
Palmer emphasizes the challenges historians face in researching archives, highlighting the intimidating nature of European libraries and access issues.
Deep dives
The Challenges of Historical Research
Researching historical archives can be a daunting experience, as highlighted by Ada Palmer's reflections on her encounters with various libraries. Many institutions, especially in Europe, can be intimidating, with some even lacking basic access information or catalogs, making the process cumbersome. For instance, Palmer recounts her ordeal navigating one small library in Padua where she needed to contact a local shopkeeper to gain entry after multiple attempts. These experiences illustrate the significant hurdles historians face while trying to uncover valuable historical texts and resources.
Debunking the Golden and Dark Ages Myth
The notion of distinct 'golden' and 'dark' ages in history is critiqued as a misleading simplification that fails to capture the complexities of historical development. Palmer argues that this dichotomy can serve political agendas, allowing groups to portray themselves as part of a 'golden' era while characterizing rivals as remnants of a 'dark' age. She emphasizes that historians should recognize this narrative as an oversimplification and instead focus on the continuous and varied progress throughout history. By challenging these myths, historians can provide more nuanced understandings of the past.
The Fluidity of the Renaissance Period
Defining the Renaissance period presents challenges, as it lacks a universally accepted start or end date, which varies across disciplines and regions. Palmer illustrates this point with examples from different academic fields—English departments often center on figures like Shakespeare, while Italian scholars may focus on Dante and Boccaccio. Such discrepancies highlight the inherent contradictions in periodization, suggesting that the Renaissance is more of a constructed narrative than an objectively defined time. This fluidity reveals how interpretations of this era shift based on contemporary priorities and nationalistic sentiments.
The Impact of Humanism and Education
Humanism during the Renaissance represented a transformative movement aimed at reshaping society through education, emphasizing the study of classical texts. Proponents of humanism believed that education in the arts and humanities could foster peace and political stability by creating virtuous citizens dedicated to the greater good. However, Palmer points out that while they aspired to this lofty goal, the actual outcomes often fell short, resulting in continued conflict rather than harmony. This paradox illustrates how educational initiatives, while noble in intention, still operated within an oligarchic framework, limiting the reach of their ideals.
Ada Palmer joins Jana Byars to talk about her new book, Inventing the Renaissance (U Chicago Press, 2025) and the ways history is written and used.
From the darkness of a plagued and war-torn Middle Ages, the Renaissance (we’re told) heralds the dawning of a new world—a halcyon age of art, prosperity, and rebirth. Hogwash! or so says award-winning novelist and historian Ada Palmer. In Inventing the Renaissance, Palmer turns her witty and irreverent eye on the fantasies we’ve told ourselves about Europe’s not-so-golden age, myths she sets right with sharp clarity.
Palmer’s Renaissance is altogether desperate. Troubled by centuries of conflict, she argues, Europe looked to a long-lost Roman Empire (even its education practices) to save them from unending war. Later historians met their own political challenges with a similarly nostalgic vision, only now they looked to the Renaissance and told a partial story. To right this wrong, Palmer offers fifteen provocative portraits of Renaissance men and women (some famous, some obscure) whose lives reveal a far more diverse, fragile, and wild Renaissance than its glowing reputation suggests.