

A Knockout Blow to Penal Substitution? Engaging John Mark Comer on the Atonement
8 snips Aug 12, 2025
A thought-provoking discussion arises as recent criticisms of penal substitutionary atonement challenge its place in theology. Gavin Ortlund systematically outlines five reasons why this doctrine remains essential for Christians. The conversation delves into the deep connections between salvation, legal obligations, and the assurance of righteousness through Christ's grace. Listeners will find insights on how grace liberates believers from fear and shame while illuminating the hope of resurrection.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
PSA Defined And Central
- Penal substitutionary atonement (PSA) says Jesus bore the penalty of our sins by dying in our place.
- Gavin frames PSA as a central explanation for how Christ's death reconciles us to God.
Critiques Often Target Caricatures
- Many criticisms of PSA attack caricatures rather than nuanced academic defenses.
- Gavin urges a comprehensive view that integrates legal themes with other biblical atonement motifs.
Biblical Roots In Isaiah 53
- Scripture repeatedly speaks of Christ dying 'for' or 'for our sins' with substitutionary language.
- Old Testament texts like Isaiah 53 show sin-bearing and chastisement laid upon the servant, implying a penal element.