What the Commissioner hearings revealed about the EU
Nov 15, 2024
auto_awesome
Eddy Wax, a co-author of POLITICO’s Playbook, brings sharp insights on the recent EU Commissioner hearings, which showcased the political theater overshadowing actual policy discussions. The panel highlights the rising partisanship among MEPs and how it may reshape EU priorities. They discuss the potential impact of a second Trump presidency on Europe, especially regarding defense policies and political alliances. Wax also critiques the ambiguous commitments of the nominees, pointing out the urgent need for strong leadership amid escalating challenges.
The lengthy confirmation hearings highlighted increased partisanship within the EU, overshadowing substantive policy discussions and diminishing the impact of the nominees' responses.
The nominees' overly scripted performances reflected a reluctance to engage deeply with critical issues, raising concerns about the EU's future strategic direction amid geopolitical challenges.
Deep dives
Intense Hearing Marathon
The confirmation hearings for new European commission nominees over a two-week period were both extensive and politically charged. With 26 hearings lasting a total of 78 hours, the atmosphere shifted from initial excitement to fatigue as reporters covered the events. Despite some entertaining moments, the intensity of the proceedings was heightened as many candidates joined the stage to face challenging questions. Ultimately, the drawn-out nature of the process diminished the sense of jeopardy surrounding the hearings.
Shift Towards Political Polarization
The recent hearings demonstrated a shift in European politics towards increasing polarization and contentious dialogue. Questions posed during the hearings increasingly veered into controversial territory, focusing on topics such as transgender athletes, a departure from traditional policy discussions. Political polarization was visually evident in instances where candidates faced intense scrutiny from members of the European Parliament, particularly during the hearings for individuals like Teresa Ribera. These dynamics underscore a broader change, indicating that European parliamentarians are willing to engage in more partisan battles than in previous years.
Commissioners Tread Carefully
Many of the commissioner nominees appeared heavily coached, opting to stick closely to their scripts during the hearings, limiting the breadth of their responses. This lack of spontaneity led to an overall uninformative experience, as nominees veered away from personal opinions or bold commitments. Instead, they largely focused on their mission letters, tending to avoid deeper discussion on their strategic visions for Europe. The result was a series of performances that felt overly planned, offering little in terms of new insights into their roles.
Concerns Over EU's Future Priorities
The discussions raised questions about the EU's future, particularly regarding its defense policies and economic competitiveness in light of global political changes. Candidates referenced the impact of Donald Trump's election and the necessity for the EU to bolster its defense spending without committing to new budgetary initiatives. With fears about the effectiveness of collaboration between the EU and the U.S., the nominees offered nuanced stances on their future action plans. However, many members of parliament remained concerned about the lack of clear and robust frameworks to address emerging geopolitical challenges.
There were 26 hearings and 72 hours of questions, answers and non-answers — and in the end, none of it mattered. Politics clearly trumped policy as MEPs grilled the aspiring new commissioners, with partisanship reaching new heights.
EU Confidential host Sarah Wheaton unpacks the Commission confirmation hearings with some of POLITICO’s top policy journalists: Senior Reporter for Iberian Affairs Aitor Hernández-Morales; Senior Defense and Space Reporter Josh Posaner; Playbook co-author Eddy Wax; and Tech and Competition Editor Aoife White.
The panel separates the theatrics from the serious policy discussion, teases out how Europe is gearing up for Donald Trump’s second presidency (and how it is not), flags which of the bloc’s priorities are set to change, and speculates how new alliances in a right-leaning Parliament could reshape the EU.
And don’t miss the latest episode of our sister podcast, Power Play, coming to you this week from COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan. Host Anne McElvoy talks with Ali Zaidi, the White House National Climate Advisor, who shares his concerns about what might happen to the Biden administration’s climate legacy under a second Trump presidency. It’s worth a listen, here.