Legal AF by MeidasTouch Trump Lawyer SCREWS UP BADLY in Final Moments of Trial
9 snips
May 29, 2024 In a chaotic trial moment, Trump's lawyer nearly triggered a mistrial with a jumbled closing argument. His confusing sports metaphors left the jury baffled while inadvertently admitting Trump's involvement in the conspiracy. The prosecution's case appears robust, bolstered by corroborating evidence beyond Michael Cohen. Despite weak counters, Blanche’s flawed strategies raised questions on effectiveness. With the judge’s curative instruction in play, potential appeal issues loom as the jury deliberates on a likely conviction.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Closing Argument Misstep Risks Appeal
- Todd Blanche violated a key trial rule by asking the jury not to send Trump to prison, forcing a judge to give a curative instruction.
- That misstep risks an appeal and undermines Blanche's credibility with jurors.
Attacking Cohen Was Ineffective
- Blanche attacked Michael Cohen as the central liar using confusing sports metaphors that likely failed to persuade the jury.
- The prosecution had already inoculated the jury with corroborating evidence beyond Cohen.
Signed Checks Undercut 'Unaware' Defense
- Blanche repeatedly admitted damning facts, including nine checks signed by Trump, which indicate willfulness and involvement.
- Those concessions undercut the defense narrative that Trump was unaware of the transactions.