AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Anxiety is a natural protective response that alerts us to potential threats and helps us take preventive action. It is a useful system that has evolved to ensure our survival by signaling the possibility of losing something important. The threshold for anxiety to activate is set high because the cost of missing a potential threat is much greater than the cost of false alarms. However, individuals who experience excessive or unwarranted anxiety may have a heightened sensitivity in their anxiety response system. This can be a result of various factors, such as past experiences or genetic predispositions. Understanding the evolutionary basis of anxiety helps individuals recognize its protective role and manage it in a more effective way.
Sadness, unlike anxiety, is a response to a loss that has already occurred. It may not appear immediately useful, as it cannot change the past. However, sadness serves an important function by motivating behavior that can prevent further losses and initiate adaptive responses. For example, in response to the loss of a loved one, sadness can prompt individuals to seek support from others, take necessary precautions to avoid similar losses in the future, or adapt their behaviors to prevent similar situations. Sadness plays a role in recalibrating our responses and guiding our actions to minimize future losses. Overall, sadness is an emotion that allows us to grieve, reassess our circumstances, and ultimately adapt to prevent future losses.
Depression presents a more complex challenge to understand from an evolutionary perspective. The high prevalence of depression poses questions about why a condition that impairs reproductive fitness would persist in the population. One possible explanation is that depression may have had adaptive functions in the ancestral environment, such as signaling the need to conserve energy during difficult times or deterring risky behaviors. However, with the significant disruptions and pressures of our modern lifestyle, these adaptive responses may become maladaptive and contribute to the development of depression. Depression is a multifaceted phenomenon, influenced by a combination of genetic, environmental, and social factors. Exploring the complex interplay of these factors can provide valuable insights into the origins and management of depression.
Individuals can have varying mood levels due to the recombination of genes each generation. The interaction between multiple genes can result in extreme mood swings or a lack thereof. This variation is maintained by natural selection to adapt to different situations. However, some individuals who fall on the extremes may face reproductive challenges. The frequency of severe depression and anxiety has been debated, with some studies suggesting it remains relatively stable over time. The effects of modern life, social structures, diet, exercise, and cultural factors on mental health are still unclear.
The constant generation of variation in genes through sexual reproduction can lead to incompatibilities and mutations with potential negative effects. The body's biology is subject to breakdowns as well, due to the challenges of maintaining genetic integrity. Our bodies and minds are not adapted perfectly to the modern world, and this mismatch can contribute to ill health. However, it is important to note that there may not always be specific explanations for individual diseases or disorders, as the complexity of gene-environment interactions and epistasis (gene-gene interactions) make it challenging to pinpoint exact causes.
Natural selection maintains variation in traits, including mood regulation mechanisms. Each individual's genetic makeup and interactions between genes play a role in depression and other mental health conditions. Epistatic interactions may help explain the heritability and variation observed. The effects of modern environments and social structures on mental health are still being researched. Variation in mood and mental health illustrate the ongoing evolutionary process of optimizing cognitive and social abilities, which can lead to challenges but also potential benefits.
Evolutionary thinking is revolutionizing psychiatry, providing new insights into mental disorders. By understanding how our minds and behaviors were shaped by natural selection, we can better comprehend the origins and vulnerabilities of mental disorders. This perspective challenges the simplistic view that genes or specific brain structures solely cause disorders, emphasizing the importance of evolutionary mechanisms. This approach offers a paradigm shift in understanding mental health and provides opportunities for more effective treatments in the future.
Evolutionary medicine has made significant strides in understanding and treating infectious diseases and autoimmune disorders. By using evolutionary theory, researchers have developed strategies to combat antibiotic resistance and improve cancer treatments. They have also explored how changes in our environment and reduced exposure to pathogens contribute to the rising prevalence of autoimmune disorders. Applying evolutionary principles to medicine opens up new avenues for understanding the causes and optimizing treatments of various diseases.
Evolutionary psychiatry aims to uncover why we are vulnerable to mental disorders by studying the basic science behind our minds. While it is still an ongoing process with much more to discover, this approach highlights the impact of evolution on shaping our mental capacities, character, and reactions to certain stimuli. Specific behaviors and traits may have been advantageous in certain ancestral environments, but evolution may not have had the selection power to program for behaviors that were only beneficial in narrow circumstances. Additionally, genes that influence mental disorders are not limited to protein-coding regions, but are found in so-called 'junk DNA.' Understanding the genetic interactions and variations that make people vulnerable to mental disorders is an important focus for ongoing research, aided by advancements in genomic data analysis.
One hypothesis from evolutionary psychology suggests that there should be a difference in levels of risk-taking between the sexes. Research has shown that men tend to engage in riskier behaviors and exhibit higher mortality rates compared to women. This difference in risk-taking behavior may be influenced by various factors, including cultural and biological aspects. However, it is essential to approach such hypotheses with caution, as generalizing sex differences across all individuals and cultures can lead to oversimplification and potential biases. Comprehensive studies are needed to further explore the complexities and variations in risk-taking behavior between sexes and across different contexts.
Mental health problems like depression and anxiety affect enormous numbers of people and severely interfere with their lives. By contrast, we don’t see similar levels of physical ill health in young people. At any point in time, something like 20% of young people are working through anxiety or depression that’s seriously interfering with their lives — but nowhere near 20% of people in their 20s have severe heart disease or cancer or a similar failure in a key organ of the body other than the brain.
From an evolutionary perspective, that’s to be expected, right? If your heart or lungs or legs or skin stop working properly while you’re a teenager, you’re less likely to reproduce, and the genes that cause that malfunction get weeded out of the gene pool.
So why is it that these evolutionary selective pressures seemingly fixed our bodies so that they work pretty smoothly for young people most of the time, but it feels like evolution fell asleep on the job when it comes to the brain? Why did evolution never get around to patching the most basic problems, like social anxiety, panic attacks, debilitating pessimism, or inappropriate mood swings? For that matter, why did evolution go out of its way to give us the capacity for low mood or chronic anxiety or extreme mood swings at all?
Today’s guest, Randy Nesse — a leader in the field of evolutionary psychiatry — wrote the book Good Reasons for Bad Feelings, in which he sets out to try to resolve this paradox.
Links to learn more, video, highlights, and full transcript.
In the interview, host Rob Wiblin and Randy discuss the key points of the book, as well as:
Producer and editor: Keiran Harris
Audio Engineering Lead: Ben Cordell
Technical editing: Dominic Armstrong
Transcriptions: Katy Moore
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode