

Siliconsciousness: What Washington (and Plenty of Other Folks) are Getting Wrong About AI
Sep 26, 2025
Russell Brandom, AI editor at TechCrunch, joins David Rothkopf to untangle the AI hype surrounding Washington. They discuss why framing AI as a national security issue is misguided, and how treating AI as a monolithic challenge ignores its diverse applications. Russell sheds light on the impact of open-source models on U.S. competitiveness and the complicated relationship between big tech and politics. He warns about over-reliance on AI in critical areas, raising important questions about the future of human-machine interaction.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
AI Is Many Specialized Technologies
- AI is not a single moonshot toward AGI but a set of specialized tools reshaping many industries.
- Companies will bolt models onto specific products rather than race only for an all-purpose intelligence.
Policy Framing Shapes Market Direction
- Treating AI companies like defense contractors warps policy and market incentives.
- Open-source alternatives exist, and U.S. secrecy incentives push others (notably China) to lead open models.
Infrastructure Incentives Favor Big Models
- Cloud and chip vendors benefit from large models, reducing incentives to optimize efficiency.
- That dynamic can slow development of smaller, cheaper models despite technical feasibility.