The proposal for the U.S. to acquire Greenland raises eyebrows and questions about legality. Historical land deals, like the Louisiana Purchase, highlight the nuances of sovereignty purchases. Territorial acquisitions are often complex, involving indigenous rights and modern international norms. The legacy of past transactions reveals the challenges of such ambitions today. Additionally, Greenland's desire for independence and implications for its sovereignty add layers to this intriguing discussion.
The historical practice of sovereignty purchases has allowed the U.S. to acquire much of its territory, though often through coercive means.
Today, the concept of purchasing territories like Greenland faces significant challenges due to modern emphasis on self-determination and local consent.
Deep dives
The Concept of Sovereignty Purchases
Sovereignty purchases refer to the practice where one government buys the political rights and governmental powers of another government over a territory. This concept has historical roots, with the United States having acquired about 40% of its territory through such transactions, including major land deals like the Louisiana Purchase and the acquisition of Alaska. Additionally, many past sovereignty purchases involved complex dynamics, including coercion or conflicts, as seen in the annexation of Texas and subsequent territorial gains from Mexico. Understanding this history helps contextualize contemporary discussions regarding the potential sale of territories like Greenland.
Challenges of Modern Sovereignty Deals
The prospect of the U.S. purchasing large territories today is fraught with challenges that did not exist in the past. Modern international relations increasingly emphasize the rights of self-determination and consent of local populations, which complicates the notion of acquiring land through purchase. Specifically, Greenland, with its population of around 56,000, desires independence from Denmark rather than being sold, highlighting the contemporary focus on the wishes of the people residing in any given territory. This marks a significant shift from historical precedents where the inhabitants had little or no say in arrangements that affected their governance.
Sovereignty Purchases Today and Their Implications
While the large-scale sovereignty purchases seen in history are rare, smaller-scale agreements continue to exist under different terms, often including military arrangements or base leases. Countries frequently negotiate for the rights to establish military bases in foreign lands, which can resemble a form of sovereignty lease rather than outright purchase. This evolution indicates that while the nature of territorial acquisition has changed, the desire for strategic advantages remains. Overall, these modern equivalents suggest a transformation in the context and methodology of how countries negotiate control and influence over territories.
President Donald Trump's proposal that the United States take "ownership" of Greenland has raised a lot of eyebrows. Can the U.S. just buy itself this big territory? Is that a thing? Turns out if you look at U.S. history, it's absolutely a thing.
Today on the show: how massive land deals called "sovereignty purchases" have shaped the country we live in today, and why the idea of the U.S. buying Greenland is a lot more complicated than it would have been in the past.
For sponsor-free episodes of The Indicator from Planet Money, subscribe to Planet Money+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org.