Ryan Mac, a tech reporter at the New York Times and co-author of "Character Limit: How Elon Musk Destroyed Twitter," dives into the turmoil within the U.S. Digital Service following mass resignations over leadership changes. He discusses the challenges of transparency and accountability amidst pressure from new directives. The conversation also covers the political repercussions of these events, the role of social media in shaping public perception, and the looming threat of a government shutdown, all in the shadow of Musk’s influence.
Federal workers at the U.S. Digital Service resigned in protest against management changes from DOGE, expressing concerns over transparency and leadership indifference.
Elon Musk's influence over the DOGE initiative has created a climate of fear and disorganization among federal workers, questioning his informal leadership role.
Deep dives
Protests and Resignations in the U.S. Digital Service
A significant protest occurred within the U.S. Digital Service (USDS) when 21 federal workers resigned in opposition to management changes and directives from the new administration. This group, representing about one-third of the remaining staff, publicly expressed their discontent through a letter addressed to the White House chief of staff and created a website to voice their concerns. Their resignation highlighted transparency issues and dissatisfaction surrounding the shift into the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and its leadership, which they accused of being indifferent to their expertise. The workers positioned themselves as 'builders' in contrast to the 'destroyers' they felt the new administration embodied, emphasizing the perceived disconnect between management and the technologically adept federal workforce.
Resistance Amidst Lack of Clarity
Amidst the upheaval, uncertainty loomed over federal agencies, particularly the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), where staff attempted to identify incoming DOGE staffers who provided minimal information. Employees captured video footage of these newcomers, signaling growing concern over their presence and roles within the agency. The union representing CFPB workers filed lawsuits challenging the legality of DOGE’s operations, emphasizing claims of privacy violations and overreach. This atmosphere of confusion and resistance painted a picture of a workforce bewildered by an opaque management structure, with employees responding humorously and defiantly—such as using spoon emojis in lieu of forks in internal communications—as forms of protest.
The Influence and Reach of Elon Musk
Elon Musk's presence and influence over the government efficiency initiative has raised questions regarding his official role and the implications of his informal leadership style. Despite being characterized as a presidential advisor, his actions and public statements reflect a hands-on approach and a narrative where he operates as a key figure within the administration. Employees feel threatened by directives he issues, which often mirror his management of Twitter, leading to disorganization and fear among federal workers. As the situation progresses, the stark divide between those who stay due to financial necessity and those in active resistance becomes clear, illustrating the complexities faced by employees under Musk’s controversial command.
Federal workers in the U.S. Digital Service resigned in protest over what they viewed as indiscriminate, irresponsible firings coming from the DOGE office. While lawsuits are entering the courts and protests are taking to the streets, will any of this make a difference to the chainsaw-minded leaders of DOGE?
Want more What Next TBD? Subscribe to Slate Plus to access ad-free listening to the whole What Next family and all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Sign up now at slate.com/whatnextplus to get access wherever you listen.
Podcast production by Evan Campbell and Patrick Fort.
