

Female check-writers alone aren’t enough to close the female fundraising gap, data shows
Feb 22, 2023
In this engaging discussion, Kaisa Snellman, an economic sociologist and academic director of the INSEAD Gender Initiative, explores the nuances of female entrepreneurship and fundraising. She reveals that female-led startups relying solely on female investors are twice as likely to struggle in securing a second round of funding. Kaisa delves into gender dynamics, highlighting the biases female founders face and the unintended consequences of diversity quotas. The conversation is a thought-provoking examination of how to truly support women in business.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Gendered Funding Bias
- Female founders raising capital exclusively from female VCs face bias similar to affirmative action.
- They may be perceived as less competent, even with strong credentials, mirroring biases in other areas.
Funding Gap for Female Founders
- Women-led startups with exclusively female VCs are twice as unlikely to get second-round funding.
- This holds regardless of round size, industry, location, or investor prestige, suggesting a systemic issue.
Impact on Male-Founded Firms
- Male-founded firms aren't negatively impacted by having a female VC in their first funding round.
- This suggests the issue isn't the VC's gender but the combination of a female founder and exclusively female investors.