Megan Almon, a pro-life speaker with an MA in Christian Apologetics from Biola University, tackles the controversial idea that there’s a Christian case for abortion. She critiques progressive arguments through a biblical lens, focusing on the complexities related to justice and ethics. The discussion emphasizes the sanctity of life, highlighting the rights of the unborn while addressing societal tensions and cultural narratives. Megan also advocates for a proactive church response in promoting healing and understanding around the topic.
Rebecca Todd Peters argues that abortion can align with Christian beliefs, suggesting it is sometimes a moral good based on justice and individual circumstances.
The discussion emphasizes the emotional and subjective nature of abortion decisions, challenging traditional views that prioritize the sanctity of life.
Critics express concerns that relativistic ethics surrounding personhood and morality risk undermining universal human rights and accountability in ethical discussions.
Deep dives
The Christian Case for Abortion
Rebecca Todd Peters argues that abortion can be consistent with Christian faith and is, in fact, a moral good. She shares her own experiences with abortion and suggests that women often choose to terminate pregnancies not despite their faith but because of it. This assertion raises concerns for many, who question how such a viewpoint could be reconciled with traditional Christian teachings that value life. The discussion around her rationale emphasizes the emotional and subjective nature of the decisions individuals make regarding their reproductive health.
Normalizing Abortion
Peters claims that with one in three women experiencing abortion, it should be recognized as a normal part of women's reproductive lives. Critics argue that normality does not equate to morality, drawing parallels to historical injustices such as slavery, which were once deemed acceptable. The dialogue reflects a critical examination of societal trends influencing ethical viewpoints rather than adhering to objective moral standards. This normalization raises important questions about what society might erroneously accept as 'normal' in the face of ethical responsibilities.
Relativistic Ethics and Autonomy
Peters presents a relativistic approach to the ethics surrounding abortion, suggesting moral decisions should vary based on individual circumstances. This perspective allows for nearly any action to be justified through personal narratives and lived experiences, challenging traditional views on the sanctity of life. Critics highlight the inconsistencies in applying a relativistic ethic when addressing other moral issues that the modern moral compass deems universally wrong. This approach raises significant concerns about accountability and moral obligation in discussions about abortion.
Personhood and the Unborn
Peters differentiates between prenatal life as human but not fully a person, claiming that personhood is only recognized once certain developmental milestones are achieved, such as taking a breath. This claim introduces significant philosophical challenges, as it implies that not all humans are entitled to rights based on arbitrary distinctions like dependency or functionality. Critics argue that devaluing human rights in this way risks creating a hierarchy of human life, which undermines the ethical arguments for universal human value. This personhood debate is pivotal in discussions on the moral implications of abortion.
The Role of Scripture in the Abortion Debate
Peters contends that the Bible is silent on the topic of abortion, leading her to advocate for her views without strong scriptural backing. Critics argue that the biblical framework does provide a foundation for understanding human value that encompasses unborn life, despite the absence of direct references to abortion. The dismissal of biblical authority reflects broader issues within some modern interpretations of Christianity, raising questions about the integrity of faith when separated from scriptural truths. This debate highlights the importance of grounding moral discussions within a coherent theological framework to inform ethical decision-making.
Is there a Christian case for abortion? According to author Rebecca Todd Peters, abortion can be the result of thinking Christianly about justice. In this video, Sean invites on pro-life speaker Megan Almon to discuss the book "Trust Women: A Progressive Christian Argument for Reproductive Justice." Megan is a speaker for Apologetics, Inc., and she graduated with her MA in Christian Apologetics from Biola in 2011.
Invite Megan to speak: https://meganalmon.com/
READ: Chasing Love: Sex, Love, and Relationships in a Confused Culture (https://amzn.to/3AKMEmA)
*Get a MASTERS IN APOLOGETICS or SCIENCE AND RELIGION at BIOLA (https://bit.ly/3LdNqKf)
*USE Discount Code [SMDCERTDISC] for 25% off the BIOLA APOLOGETICS CERTIFICATE program (https://bit.ly/3AzfPFM)
*See our fully online UNDERGRAD DEGREE in Bible, Theology, and Apologetics: (https://bit.ly/448STKK)
FOLLOW ME ON SOCIAL MEDIA:
Twitter: https://twitter.com/Sean_McDowell
TikTok: @sean_mcdowell
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/seanmcdowell/
Website: https://seanmcdowell.org
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode