Dylan C. Penningroth, a UC Berkeley professor, shines a light on the often-overlooked history of Black people's interactions with the legal system. He reveals how enslaved individuals utilized contracts, property rights, and marriage laws to assert their humanity and agency. The discussion challenges the victim-centric narratives of the Jim Crow era, highlighting resilient Black institutions and community dynamics. Penningroth also critiques the portrayal of legal knowledge among Black southerners by civil rights organizations, emphasizing the complexities of civil rights narratives and the ongoing impact of law on Black lives.
The podcast challenges the traditional view of African Americans as mere victims, highlighting their active use of legal rights for agency even under slavery.
It emphasizes the complexity of slave life by revealing how informal privileges, like engaging in side work, allowed for limited autonomy and economic benefit.
Deep dives
The Subtle Erosion of Democracy
Democracy can erode gradually rather than through overt upheaval, which is often misunderstood as the only way it can be lost. Current observations in America highlight an alarming trend towards autocracy, indicating that the degradation of democratic values is occurring in the present rather than being a distant possibility. This perspective emphasizes the need for vigilance and active participation in governance, as complacency can contribute to the deterioration of democratic structures. Recognizing this gradual decline allows for a deeper understanding of the forces at work that threaten democratic ideals.
Reassessing African Americans and the Law
The traditional narrative surrounding African Americans' relationship with the law often portrays them solely as victims of oppression and exclusion. However, this perspective overlooks their active engagement and interaction with the legal system, which included certain privileges and rights that existed even in the context of slavery. Enslaved individuals, for instance, often had informal rights regarding property and were able to engage economically to improve their living conditions, despite lacking formal legal protections. Understanding these interactions reveals a more nuanced view of black life under slavery, illustrating that the legal system was not only a source of oppression but also a space where agency could play out.
The Complex Relationship with Privilege
Slaves experienced a paradox where they had privileges that, while not legally recognized, influenced their daily lives and interactions. For example, slaves were often allowed to engage in side work, raising crops or livestock, which permitted them a measure of autonomy and financial benefit despite their lack of civil rights. This allowed slave owners to save costs and benefit from the slaves’ labor, as it was economically advantageous for them. This complex interplay between the lack of rights and the existence of privileges provides a deeper understanding of the economic negotiations at play in the institution of slavery.
Rethinking the Civil Rights Narrative
The prevailing civil rights narrative sometimes simplifies the agency of African Americans as merely reactive rather than recognizing their proactivity and negotiation of rights within their communities. During the Jim Crow era, black communities were engaged in significant social and economic structures that showcased their achievements and relationships beyond the oppression they faced. This narrative shift emphasizes their capacity to build wealth and institutions, often relying on the rights of everyday use, like property and contract law, to assert their dignity and agency. Acknowledging this aspect can reshape how we view the civil rights movement, focusing less on external battles and more on the internal dynamics that empowered black communities.
There’s a traditional line of thinking about the history of Black people and the law. It describes how slaves were entirely shut out of the legal system, disenfranchised and bereft of even a modicum of legal know-how or protection.
But research from the UC Berkeley professor Dylan C. Penningroth (in his book Before the Movement: The Hidden History of Black Civil Rights) upends that narrative by tracing the overlooked history of how Black people used the law in everyday life: through rights of contract, property, marriage, and more—even under slavery and Jim Crow.
Get more from your favorite Atlantic voices when you subscribe. You’ll enjoy unlimited access to Pulitzer-winning journalism, from clear-eyed analysis and insight on breaking news to fascinating explorations of our world. Subscribe today at TheAtlantic.com/podsub.