Leah Downey, a research fellow at Cambridge University, explores the critical intersection of monetary policy and democratic theory. She argues for a more democratic approach to money creation, critiquing the traditional independence of central banks. Downey discusses the historical evolution of the Federal Reserve and advocates for increased citizen involvement in monetary policy. By introducing 'iterative governance,' she emphasizes the importance of legislative oversight to ensure that economic policies reflect the will of the people, fostering true democratic accountability.
40:05
forum Ask episode
web_stories AI Snips
view_agenda Chapters
menu_book Books
auto_awesome Transcript
info_circle Episode notes
insights INSIGHT
Money and Democracy
Monetary policy is often portrayed as unique and overly complex for public input.
Downey challenges this, arguing that money and democracy are inherently linked, as monetary policy influences resource allocation and thus shapes the future.
insights INSIGHT
Monetary Neutrality
The theory of monetary neutrality, which posits that money doesn't influence real economic production in the long run, underpins central bank independence.
Downey argues that this theory is impractical, as we live in a series of short terms where money significantly impacts what's produced.
question_answer ANECDOTE
Federal Reserve's Structure
The Federal Reserve's structure is a historical compromise, not a ground-up design for public interest.
Initially private, its evolution towards public control reflects its growing importance to the financial system.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Our Money, Monetary Policy as if Democracy Matters
Leah Downey
Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy
Joseph Schumpeter
In this seminal work, Joseph A. Schumpeter analyzes the processes of capitalism, arguing that it is both innovative and unstable due to the concept of 'creative destruction', where continuous innovation disrupts established industries. The book also examines the potential replacement of capitalism by socialism and discusses the future of democracy in evolving economic structures. Schumpeter presents a balanced view of both capitalist and socialist systems through theoretical models and comparative analysis, and he predicts that capitalism might eventually give way to socialism due to internal societal and economic changes rather than external failures[1][3][4].
How the creation of money and monetary policy can be more democratic.
The power to create money is foundational to the state. In the United States, that power has been largely delegated to private banks governed by an independent central bank. Putting monetary policy in the hands of a set of insulated, nonelected experts has fueled the popular rejection of expertise as well as a widespread dissatisfaction with democratically elected officials.
In Our Money: Monetary Policy as If Democracy Matters (Princeton UP, 2024), Leah Downey makes a principled case against central bank independence (CBI) by both challenging the economic theory behind it and developing a democratic rationale for sustaining the power of the legislature to determine who can create money and on what terms. How states govern money creation has an impact on the capacity of the people and their elected officials to steer policy over time. In a healthy democracy, Downey argues, the balance of power over money creation matters.
Downey applies and develops democratic theory through an exploration of monetary policy. In so doing, she develops a novel theory of independent agencies in the context of democratic government, arguing that states can employ expertise without being ruled by experts. Downey argues that it is through iterative governance, the legislature knowing and regularly showing its power over policy, that the people can retain their democratic power to guide policy in the modern state. As for contemporary macroeconomic arguments in defense of central bank independence, Downey suggests that the purported economic benefits do not outweigh the democratic costs.