Renewing Your Mind Is Grace Cooperative?
7 snips
Jul 24, 2025 Dive into the fascinating debate surrounding divine grace and human effort. Discover the key distinctions between Arminianism and Reformed theology, especially how Arminius describes prevenient grace as resistible. Explore the historical conflict that contrasts Pelagius and Augustine, and consider how these perspectives shape our understanding of salvation. The discussion reveals intricate theological insights and emphasizes God's role in human conversion. Plus, there's a quiz on Arminius's views to test your understanding!
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Arminius' View on Fallen Free Will
- James Arminius believed the free will of fallen man is severely incapacitated and only effective when assisted by divine grace.
- His view aligns closely with Augustine and Calvin on the seriousness of human depravity.
Arminian Internal but Resistible Grace
- Arminius taught that God’s grace works internally in the soul to liberate us from spiritual death.
- However, humans retain the ability to resist this grace, making it non-irresistible but necessary for salvation.
Effectual vs. Sufficient Grace
- Reformed theology teaches that God’s call is effectual, always bringing the intended change.
- Arminius held it is sufficient but not always effectual, requiring human acceptance to convert.
