Law Report Law Report Special - Triple mushroom murder: Erin Patterson found guilty
Jul 7, 2025
Rishi Nathwani, a defense barrister from Parnell's Barristers in Melbourne, delves into the shocking case of Erin Patterson, found guilty of poisoning her estranged husband's family. The discussion pivots around the intense jury deliberation and the critical question of Patterson's intent with the deadly mushrooms. Nathwani also highlights the legal standard of 'beyond reasonable doubt' and the complexities of jury selection, particularly in high-profile trials laden with media attention, emphasizing the delicate balance between justice and public perception.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Intent Key to Jury Verdict
- The key trial issue was whether Erin Patterson intended to poison or if it was accidental.
- The jury concluded she intended serious harm or death by serving poisonous mushrooms.
Beyond Reasonable Doubt Explained
- Juries decide based on "beyond reasonable doubt," meaning no nagging doubts.
- They must be sure of guilt; any reasonable doubt means acquittal.
Jury Can Seek Clarifications
- Juries can ask judges written questions during deliberations for clarifications.
- Judges may replay evidence or explain law to assist jury decisions.