Dan and James chat about a recent twitter discussion on open science funding and the benefits of Editors sharing their opinions online. James also shares three project proposals that he thinks deserves funding, which Dan ranks.
Other stuff...
- The Twitter thread from Tage Rai on conflicts of interest in funding on science
- The Raytheon Amphitheater at Northeastern University
- How Nature Human Behavior evaluates your mansucripts, from episode 105.
- Good and bad experiences with Frontiers journals
- A contract for getting paid for reviews
- Get access to our Patreon newsletter
- The peer-review process at eLife
- James' three grant proposal ideas
- The taxi story [Story in Norwegian but Google translate does a good enough job]
- PsycoPy
- The eyetracker that's 100x cheaper than commercial eyetrackers
- Ads in R package load up messages
- Chat about this episode on the Git Gud Science Discord server
Other links
- [Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
- [James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
- [Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
- [Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
- $1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, September 21) "116: In my opinion", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/WT46Z