AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Cato Daily Podcast
'Jawboning' and Murthy v. Missouri
Jul 10, 2024
Legal experts Walter Olson and Brent Skorup discuss the Supreme Court case Murthy v. Missouri, highlighting the concept of 'jawboning' and the importance of meeting specific legal criteria for standing. They explore government pressure on speech platforms, implications of the court ruling on standing, and strategies for ensuring government transparency.
20:33
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- Clear factors for standing are essential in legal challenges, emphasizing traceability of injury and redressability.
- Different approaches to government influence were shown in Volo and Murthy cases, highlighting nuances in establishing harm and causal links.
Deep dives
Impact of Standing on the Outcome of the Murthy Case
The Supreme Court's decision in Murthy v. Missouri focused on the importance of standing in legal challenges. Justice Amy Coney Barrett emphasized the need for plaintiffs to establish clear factors for standing, such as traceability of injury and redressability. By showcasing the lack of adequate showings by the plaintiffs in Murthy, the court highlighted the critical role of standing in determining the viability of a case.
Get the Snipd
podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered
Discover
highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any
moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share
& Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover
highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode