Louder with Crowder End All SNAP Benefits | Change My Mind
5 snips
Nov 17, 2025 During a lively discussion at the University of Oklahoma, Steven Crowder tackles the controversial topic of ending SNAP benefits amidst a government shutdown. He argues that SNAP leads to dependency and corruption, suggesting a shift to essentials-only aid. The conversation takes a surprising turn when a furry guest shares insights on the furry community, addressing misconceptions around identity and sexuality. The episode cleverly juxtaposes fiscal responsibility with cultural discussion, sparking lively debate among participants.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
SNAP Correlates With Higher Obesity Rates
- SNAP recipients buy more sugary, unhealthy items than non-recipients, correlating with higher obesity rates among SNAP users.
- Steven Crowder argues this pattern shows the program subsidizes poor dietary choices and harms public health.
Replace SNAP With Limited Essentials Program
- Do away with SNAP and replace it with a limited essentials program that enforces work requirements and restricts nonessential purchases.
- Steven Crowder recommends temporary relief plus mandatory work to reduce long-term dependency and fraud.
Welfare's Alleged Effect On Community Vitality
- Crowder contends long-term welfare has weakened Native American communities by reducing incentives to work and attracting less private investment.
- He uses reservations as a microcosm for his broader criticism of dependency on government aid.