Amarica's Constitution Dissenting in Concurrence
Mar 20, 2024
A deep dive into the dissenting Justices' critique of the Trump v. Anderson case, focusing on their disagreement with the per curiam. Exploration of the complexities of assuming motives and interpretive charity. Detailed examination of a concurrence by three Justices and their level of agreement and disagreement. Delving into the Warren Court's response to a new statute challenging prior Supreme Court cases and Congressional authority over court actions.
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Introduction
00:00 • 3min
Judging Motives and Public Service
03:29 • 11min
Dissecting a Supreme Court Concurrence
14:54 • 7min
Interpretation and Enforcement of Section Three
22:15 • 24min
Congressional Power and Legal Interpretations
45:52 • 7min
Exploring the 14th Amendment and Congressional Power
52:37 • 5min
Analyzing the 14th Amendment
57:23 • 9min
Exploring Judicial Interpretations of Constitutional Issues
01:06:42 • 27min
Analyzing Legal Case Aspects and Judicial Writing Strategies
01:33:39 • 4min