Guest David Graham, Atlantic staff writer, discusses the importance of the Stormy Daniels case in holding Trump accountable for election interference. Exploring Trump's courtroom campaigning tactics and the complexities of proving wrongdoing. Analyzing the legal challenges and implications in the Trump era.
The Stormy Daniels case might hold Trump accountable for election interference, showcasing the unique opportunity for legal repercussions.
Trump's courtroom campaigning strategy is evolving due to ongoing criminal trials, shifting focus towards media attention and victim portrayal.
Deep dives
Trump's Multiple Legal Troubles
Donald Trump is facing four separate felony trials, including charges related to retaining national defense information, racketeering, soliciting public office, and hush money payments to Stormy Daniels. These cases total over half a billion dollars in judgments and mark the first criminal trial faced by a former president, not delayed by legal tactics, making it significant in the midst of Trump's multiple legal entanglements.
The Importance of Trump's First Criminal Trial
As the first former president to face a criminal trial, Trump's current trial focuses on hush money payments and potential election interference. While some view the case as less serious compared to others, the prosecution asserts that Trump's actions constituted election interference. The trial's significance lies in holding a former president accountable for potentially criminal conduct, challenging the notion of Trump being above the law.
Implications for Trump's Political Campaign
Trump's courtroom campaign, due to the ongoing criminal trial, has altered his campaign strategies. Unable to hold rallies, Trump leverages the trial's media attention and portrays himself as a victim, appealing to his base. While this spectacle may energize his supporters, it risks alienating independent voters. The trial's outcome and Trump's behavior during the proceedings may significantly impact his political future and perception among voters.
The Stormy Daniels case may have a less serious fact pattern. But it might turn out to be the one chance to hold Donald Trump accountable for election interference. Atlantic staff writer David Graham explains the importance of the case and how Trump might actually be enjoying this new form of courtroom campaigning.
Get more from your favorite Atlantic voices when you subscribe. You’ll enjoy unlimited access to Pulitzer-winning journalism, from clear-eyed analysis and insight on breaking news to fascinating explorations of our world. Subscribe today at TheAtlantic.com/podsub.