What Next: What Was The Point of Israel’s Pager Attack?
Sep 23, 2024
auto_awesome
Shane Harris, an intelligence and national security reporter at the Washington Post, joins to discuss Israel's recent military actions against Hezbollah. They dive into what Israel's blowing up of pagers and walkie-talkies really signifies in the geopolitical landscape. The conversation examines the moral implications of civilian safety amidst military strategies, and how these actions are perceived internationally. The evolution of Hezbollah from a militant group to a political entity also plays a key role in their analysis.
Israel's destruction of Hezbollah's communication devices signals a bold military strategy and potential escalation in regional conflict.
The attacks raise ethical concerns about civilian casualties, complicating Israel's justification under international laws of armed conflict.
Deep dives
Escalation of Conflict in the Middle East
The recent shifts in military focus by Israel towards Hezbollah in Lebanon signal an escalating conflict in the region. The Israeli military, amid a brutal deadlock in Gaza, launched a series of attacks targeting Hezbollah, which some experts believe could mark the beginning of a larger confrontation. This escalation includes systematic strikes against Hezbollah's communication infrastructure, exemplified by the destruction of pagers and walkie-talkies owned by its members. Such actions not only aim to disrupt Hezbollah's operational capabilities but also serve as a psychological message, asserting Israel's ability to carry out precision strikes even within Lebanon.
Consequences of Military Operations
The Israeli operations against Hezbollah have raised significant concerns about civilian casualties and the ethical implications of such military tactics. The pager bombings resulted in dozens of casualties, including innocent civilians, indicating the risks associated with high-stakes military confrontations. Notably, reports emerged of a child being killed when a pager exploded, raising ethical questions about the responsibility inherent in targeting such devices. Analysts argue that while Israel may justify the attacks under the guise of combatting a legitimate military threat, the disregard for collateral damage introduces severe moral dilemmas that challenge international norms.
Implications for U.S. Foreign Policy
The intensifying conflict between Israel and Hezbollah is happening against the backdrop of an impending U.S. presidential election, which adds complexity to American foreign policy in the region. Current candidates like Kamala Harris and Donald Trump will need to prepare for potential escalation in the Middle East that could require U.S. intervention or a reassessment of support for Israel. Experts note that Israel's actions, executed without prior consultation with the U.S., raise questions about the reliability of the alliance and the constraints on U.S. influence. The situation emphasizes the need for the next administration to formulate clear policies regarding support for Israel amid rising tensions in the region.
What message was Israel sending to Hezbollah, its backers, and the population of Lebanon, by blowing up pagers and walkie-talkies last week? And does the international community view this act as a violation of the laws of armed conflict?
Guest: Shane Harris, intelligence and national security reporter at the Washington Post.
Want more What Next? Subscribe to Slate Plus to access ad-free listening to the whole What Next family and across all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Sign up now at slate.com/whatnextplus to get access wherever you listen.
Podcast production by Elena Schwartz, Paige Osburn, Anna Phillips, Madeline Ducharme and Rob Gunther.