The Fox News Rundown The Case Against Comey And The "Weaponization" Of The DOJ
Oct 9, 2025
Former federal prosecutor Jim Trusty discusses the legal intricacies of James Comey's indictment, focusing on false statements and obstruction charges. He highlights concerns over the politicization of the DOJ and contrasts the case with other high-profile prosecutions. Winsome Earle-Sears, Virginia's Lieutenant Governor, shares her campaign priorities, emphasizing job creation and tax relief while addressing local school policies and the impact of national politics on her race. The upcoming gubernatorial debate is positioned as crucial for directly challenging her opponent.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Comey Frames Charges As Political Retaliation
- James Comey pleaded not guilty and framed the case as political revenge by Donald Trump.
- The indictment centers on his 2017/2020 Senate testimony about authorizing leaks to the press.
Case Is Factually Narrow, Procedurally Fraught
- Jim Trusty says the substantive legal question is narrow: did Comey lie to Congress about leaking.
- He predicts procedural battles will dominate, not complex novel legal theories.
Obstruction Charge Can Be Easier To Prove
- Trusty explains obstruction differs subtly from false-statement charges and can be easier for prosecutors when statements mislead.
- He calls the distinctions technical but potentially meaningful for conviction strategy.